You might want to consider WebTest (webtest.canoo.com).
WebTest "test" scripts are like ant "build" scripts.
You can mix and match whatever ant tasks you want with
webtest tasks (called steps because they are actually
extend ant's Task and provide a reference to a context
which contains the state
James Fuller wrote:
what they really need is a functional test harness. I had some .pl
code up on iseran.com that tested a bit of it, but we should really
create a WAR and bring it up in Jetty or something.
why not jmeter ?
All the test harness really is is some things that are served up on
>
> what they really need is a functional test harness. I had some .pl
> code up on iseran.com that tested a bit of it, but we should really
> create a WAR and bring it up in Jetty or something.
>
why not jmeter ?
jim fuller
-
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice. I like it! If we ever get round to finishing
the httpPost task in
the sandbox, we have a Rest client system :)
So what, exactly, do these need?
what they really need is a functional test harness. I had some .pl code