Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-10-06 Thread Peter Reilly
It has been a week since the vote started, there are 6 +1s, 0 0s and 0 -1s, Unless there is a -1, I will commit the change later today. Peter On 9/29/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/29/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Reilly wrote: > > Impact: It i

Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Dominique Devienne
On 9/29/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: > Impact: It is a one-line change. > Influence release of 1.7: I do not think so. In that case +1 +1. --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, +1 from me Antoine - Original Message - From: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:23 PM Subject: VOTE: deferring resolving of references > Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end

Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Peter Reilly wrote: Impact: It is a one-line change. Influence release of 1.7: I do not think so. (I think that we need to release an ant 1.7beta3 soon, freeze commits after that (or branch) and try to get as many users to try it out.) There are BC issues: some scripts may depend on references

Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Reilly
Impact: It is a one-line change. Influence release of 1.7: I do not think so. (I think that we need to release an ant 1.7beta3 soon, freeze commits after that (or branch) and try to get as many users to try it out.) There are BC issues: some scripts may depend on references defined in tasks that

Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Matt Benson
+1 -Matt - Original Message From: Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ant Developers List Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 10:23:22 AM Subject: VOTE: deferring resolving of references Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a conclusion. should we defer res

Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Peter Reilly wrote: Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a conclusion. should we defer resolving references until runtime: original message " Currently in ant, there is two steps in processing a project build file, a parsing step and an execution step. In the parsing step a DOM li

Re: VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
+1. This is one of illogical places left in ANT. - Alexey. On 9/29/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a conclusion. should we defer resolving references until runtime: original message " Currently in ant, there is two steps in proce

VOTE: deferring resolving of references

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Reilly
Hi, I started a thead last week that did not end in a conclusion. should we defer resolving references until runtime: original message " Currently in ant, there is two steps in processing a project build file, a parsing step and an execution step. In the parsing step a DOM like structure of Target