Most of these are setX(x) where x is already defined in the javadoc.
So there is no point in repeating the definition. (see the javadoc for
most of the jdk).
The buildexception statement is a bit meaningless, but it does capture
what will happen.
Peter
Martijn Kruithof wrote:
I understand the impor
I understand the importance of improving the style, but shouldn't we
prefer no comments (warnings stay to indicate they are missing)
over this kind of comments:
Kind Regards, Martijn
+ * @param file a File value
+ * @param algorithm a String value
+ * @param provider a String value
peterreilly2005/01/06 03:15:37
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Checksum.java
Log:
checkstyle
Revision ChangesPath
1.43 +37 -6 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Checksum.java
Index: Checksum.java
peterreilly2005/01/06 03:11:04
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Checksum.java
ImportTask.java Redirector.java Recorder.java
Untar.java
Log:
remove imports
Obtained from: Kevin Jackson
Revision ChangesPath
1.
bodewig 2003/06/24 08:28:23
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks checksum.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Checksum.java
Log:
2003 and some 'since' information
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -0 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/checksum.html
Index
