On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:06 +0100, Steve Loughran wrote:
> > Hmm. Currently the task is only writing the first
> > child as the root element of the output XML document,
> > and including the XML declaration. AFAIK a
> > non-well-formed fragment should forego the
> > declaration. If so, we can do
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Phil Weighill Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
More along the lines of will it work with
something
like:
ha, no, but it should, and will...
Hmm. Currently the task is only writing th
Matt Benson wrote:
[...] AFAIK a
non-well-formed fragment should forego the
declaration.
I believe you can actually put an XML declaration in a doc with multiple
top-level fragments, if you are using it as a parsed external entity.
(Only useful to declare the encoding.) But I guess that few p
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nice. I like it! If we ever get round to finishing
> > the httpPost task in
> > the sandbox, we have a Rest client system :)
> >
>
> So what, exactly, do these need?
Other than spaces around ope
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nice. I like it! If we ever get round to finishing
> the httpPost task in
> the sandbox, we have a Rest client system :)
>
So what, exactly, do these need?
-Matt
>
-
> To unsub
Ant script.
Phil :n)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 25/05/2005 18:40
To: Ant Developers List
Cc:
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks echoxml.html
--- M
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Phil Weighill Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > More along the lines of will it work with
> something
> > like:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ha, no, but it should, and will...
Hmm. Currentl
--- Phil Weighill Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More along the lines of will it work with something
> like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
ha, no, but it should, and will...
Thanks,
Matt
>
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 05:04 -0700, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> > --- Phil We
More along the lines of will it work with something like:
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 05:04 -0700, Matt Benson wrote:
> --- Phil Weighill Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does it support document fragments?
> >
> Do you mean programmatically? No.
>
> -Mat
--- Phil Weighill Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it support document fragments?
>
Do you mean programmatically? No.
-Matt
> Phil :n.
>
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:38 +0100, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
> > Matt Benson wrote:
> > > --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
Does it support document fragments?
Phil :n.
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:38 +0100, Steve Loughran wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > --- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Why not to add this functionality into normal
> >>?
> >
> >
> > I suppose if you wanted to use entities,
> >
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not to add this functionality into normal
?
I suppose if you wanted to use entities,
already can do this (clumsily). This task (OUCH
actually doesn't compile b/c I forgot a file) was
exceedingly easy and enforces well-f
I am just thinking that less tasks is better. If we can add
functionality into existing tasks there will less documentation and
code to maintain.
- Alexey.
On 5/24/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Do you mean, that the
--- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Do you mean, that the current task cannot be
> made to accept
> XMLFragment?
It could, but for easiest coding, the XMLFragment
would then be represented by a discrete nested
element:
Alternatively,
Do you mean, that the current task cannot be made to accept
XMLFragment?
- Alexey.
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not to add this functionality into normal
?
I suppose if you wanted to use entities,
already can do this (clumsily). This tas
--- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not to add this functionality into normal
> ?
I suppose if you wanted to use entities,
already can do this (clumsily). This task (OUCH
actually doesn't compile b/c I forgot a file) was
exceedingly easy and enforces well-formedness of the
nes
Why not to add this functionality into normal ?
- Alexey.
On 24 May 2005 20:49:55 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> mbenson 2005/05/24 13:49:55
>
> Modified: docs/manual coretasklist.html
> . WHATSNEW
> src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs defaults.properties
> Added: s
mbenson 2005/05/24 13:49:55
Modified:docs/manual coretasklist.html
.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs defaults.properties
Added: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs EchoXML.java
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/a
18 matches
Mail list logo
