gt;
> >- Original Message -
>
> From: "peter reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:38 AM
> >Subject: Re: copy task addition
> >
> >
> >I
On Wed, 28 May 2003, David Kavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could easily add another mode to the tag that would make
> use of the project properties.
Hmm, if you want to explore that road further, you may want to look at
the new propertyset data-type in CVS, something like
could be
--- Original Message -
From: "peter reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: copy task addition
I do not think this is a good idea. It will
add @property@ to ${property} as a way
oh, ok. That takes care of David's needs,
I would think.
Cheers,
Magesh
- Original Message -
From: "peter reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: copy task addition
handling of $)
Peter
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 12:22, Magesh Umasankar wrote:
> I will take a look at commiting it in the next few days...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: David Kavanagh
> To: Ant Developers List
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:52 AM
> Subject: R
I will take a look at commiting it in the next few days...
- Original Message -
From: David Kavanagh
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: copy task addition
OK, so I made a FilterProperties class that does the token filtering like I
wanted. I
OK, so I made a FilterProperties class that does the token filtering like
I wanted. I've attached the code for that class and the diff for the FilterChain.java
file.
In the task, you can now use
and filter for tokens of the form @token@ based on the project properties.
As a refresher
On Tue, 27 May 2003, David Kavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My stuff must function differently,
will replace ${foo} style constructs while you
need to replace @foo@ IIUC.
> but I can see that implementing it as a filterchain option would be
> better than the attribute I chose to use.
Yes,
Conor,
I was hoping you were right. I followed the docs on how to use the
filterchain in my copy task and I can't get those values to be replaced.
I even tried defining a property inside my build.xml file and that
didn't get picked up either.
My stuff must function differently, but I can see tha
On Tue, 27 May 2003 12:23 am, David Kavanagh wrote:
> I just signed on to contribute something we found useful.
>
> We wanted to filter files based on the project properties. This is
> because we do something like this in the top of our build.xml file;
>
>
>
>
>
> So, we couldn't use
I just signed on to contribute something we found useful.
We wanted to filter files based on the project properties. This is
because we do something like this in the top of our build.xml file;
So, we couldn't use properties pulled from any arbitrary files without
modifying the copy t
11 matches
Mail list logo