Re: compatibility matrix

2016-03-26 Thread Andre-John mas
I think that should be fine. Thanks Sent from my tablet > On Mar 26, 2016, at 06:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On 2016-03-25, André-John Mas wrote: >> >> Missed this. Must admit I had forgotten it was there and it hadn't >> occurred to me to check there. At the same time was thinking someth

Re: compatibility matrix

2016-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-03-25, André-John Mas wrote: > Missed this. Must admit I had forgotten it was there and it hadn't > occurred to me to check there. At the same time was thinking something > on the main page would draw more attention? André-John, do you think what I've published for the front page is suffi

Re: compatibility matrix

2016-03-25 Thread André-John Mas
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Adopt Java8 as Baseline for 1.10 on master Branch >> >>> On 2016-03-22, André-John Mas wrote: >>> >>> I don't mind which version we go with, but I would like to see the >>> main Ant home page be clear about which Ant version to use, ba

compatibility matrix

2016-03-22 Thread jhm
Branch > > On 2016-03-22, André-John Mas wrote: > > > I don't mind which version we go with, but I would like to see the > > main Ant home page be clear about which Ant version to use, based on > > installed Java version. > > > Could we have a compatibil