On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When we go back to 0, I think we should include the checkstyle
> validation in gump.
> WDYT?
Agreed.
Xavier
>
>
> Gilles
>
>
> 2008/8/25 Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Ivy team,
> >
> > I've noticed that the
When we go back to 0, I think we should include the checkstyle
validation in gump.
WDYT?
Gilles
2008/8/25 Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Ivy team,
>
> I've noticed that the number of checkstyle errors in our code base has
> raised up to 61 errors. We've done a large effort to reduce it t
Hi Ivy team,
I've noticed that the number of checkstyle errors in our code base has
raised up to 61 errors. We've done a large effort to reduce it to zero some
months ago, it would be nice to keep an eye on this to avoid introducing new
errors. If you use eclipse, I especially recommend the checks
