DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2006-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2006-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2006-10-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2006-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2006-08-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2005-03-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: assertions

2004-05-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 08 May 2004, Yuji Yamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the description of assertions in > docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html is not clear. Because we can use > assertions only if fork=true. Maybe JUnit tasks's manual has same > problem.

assertions

2004-05-07 Thread Yuji Yamano
I think the description of assertions in docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html is not clear. Because we can use assertions only if fork=true. Maybe JUnit tasks's manual has same problem. I don't know future plan, but at leaset, 1.6.x manual must be fixed. -- Yuji Yamano <[EMAIL PROTECTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27218] - Assertions data-type doesn't work in and

2004-04-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27218 Assertions data-type doesn't work in and --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-20 06:54 --- OK, should be merged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27218] - Assertions data-type doesn't work in and

2004-04-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27218 Assertions data-type doesn't work in and [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAI

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27218] - Assertions data-type doesn't work in and

2004-04-20 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27218 Assertions data-type doesn't work in and [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAI

Re: Junit assertions

2004-04-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I see the problem: I think I have a spare quarter of an hour to look into fixing it. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional command

Re: Junit assertions

2004-04-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
OK, I see the problem: In CommandlineJava#addCommandsToList(ListIterator) we have //now any assertions are added if (getAssertions() != null) { getAssertions().applyAssertions(this); } this adds VmArgs to the CommandlineJava instance for the configured

Re: Junit assertions

2004-04-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So CommandLineJava#getCommandline() produces a result without the > -ea switch on the first invocation and one with the argument on the > second. Actually it adds -ea:AssertionTest on each invocation. If you use multiple log statem

Re: Junit assertions

2004-04-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
If you move the log statement in front of setCommandLine as in log(cmd.describeCommand(), Project.MSG_VERBOSE); execute.setCommandline(cmd.getCommandline()); the tests will pass but -ea: will not be part of the verbose output. So CommandLineJava#getCommandline() produces a result

Re: Junit assertions

2004-04-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Run it with -debug instead of -verbose ... Execute:Java13CommandLauncher: Executing '/usr/local/java/j2sdk1.4.2_04/jre/bin/java' with arguments: '-ea:AssertionTest' '-classpath' '/home/bodewig/ASF/jakarta/jakarta-ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions/b

Re: Junit assertions

2004-04-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am very confused. So am I on first glance. If it helps a little, the problem is a cross-platform one. Happens on my Linux box running Sun's 1.4.2_04 as well. Stefan -

Junit assertions

2004-04-19 Thread Steve Loughran
K\jre\bin\java.exe' with arguments: [junit] '-ea:AssertionTest' [junit] '-classpath' [junit] 'C:\Java\Apache\ant\src\etc\testcases\types\assertions\build;C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib\junit.jar;C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib\ant-launcher.jar;C:\Java\Apache\ant\lib

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions - New directory

2003-09-23 Thread stevel
stevel 2003/09/22 22:48:11 ant/src/etc/testcases/types/assertions - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/assertions - New directory

2003-08-08 Thread stevel
stevel 2003/08/07 17:34:27 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/assertions - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2003-07-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-08 16:09 --- I was vaguely aware of the in-jvm assertion stuff, but was curious about implications for the Ant classloaders to add ass

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2003-07-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-08 02:56 --- Thanks, I didn't see that class. That would be more natural - to add an subelement to . If I have another moment, I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2003-07-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-08 00:56 --- hey Jesse. you know there is an Assertions class in ant.types whose role in life is to represent sets of assertions i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2003-07-07 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-07 23:49 --- Created an attachment (id=7142) Added test case; save as src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2003-07-07 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-07 23:48 --- Created an attachment (id=7141) Suggested patch against CVS trunk (see also added file in next atta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21387] New: - [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code

2003-07-07 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code Summary: [PATCH] Permit to turn on Java (1.4) assertions in tests + tested code Product: Ant Version: 1.6Alpha (nightly) Platform: PC