Matt Benson wrote:
As for how the proposed relates to ,
I imagine it would extend in almost or exactly
the same way that extends .
makes sense...sometimes there is the need, and you dont always want to
write a new task.
See also , which turns resources into arguments for java
http://ant
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Example name for the task we've talked about before
> but have not written for inclusion,
+1 for adding one.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
On 5/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Obviously
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Example name for the task we've talked about
> before
> > but have not written for inclusion, the
> > counter-argument being that the correct thing to
> do
> > here would be write a custom
On 5/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Example name for the task we've talked about before
but have not written for inclusion, the
counter-argument being that the correct thing to do
here would be write a custom task. But there are Java
programs (which shall remain nameless) that are
Example name for the task we've talked about before
but have not written for inclusion, the
counter-argument being that the correct thing to do
here would be write a custom task. But there are Java
programs (which shall remain nameless) that are
ridiculously complicated to call API-style due to th
