On 2018-07-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Here's a status of the current state of upstream repo branches
> "master" and "1.9.x".
Many thanks, Jaikiran and many thanks for the detailed report. I've been
able to reproduce the checks you've performed.
I'll build RCs for the next Ant releases soon.
Stef
On 2018-07-06, wrote:
> That would reduce the original "2f64e0b5" diff to (the extra lines
> starting with \ before the diff are added by the checker i wrote)
Thanks, Martijn
I've just committed the fix to Ant's URL inside jdepend.xsl.
Stefan
-
I have re done the revert and merge locally, and compared the diff between my
local banches and the remote one. I had only diffs due to my editor
automatically removing trailing space on empty lines, and I had to figure out
what the status of the apt tasks (and indeed it doesn’t need to be merge
Hello Martijn,
Thank you for spending time on this and for that checker. I did look
into yourmail and considered itbefore deciding on what to do with the
state of upstream branches.I decided to go with a complete revert
approach (which I explain in a separate reply in this thread), because I
Here's a status of the current state of upstream repo branches "master"
and "1.9.x". But before getting to it, I would like to state that I
really had no pleasure in doing these reverts. I really do mean it. I
wish we had never ended up in this situation (and hopefully will never
again), but I
Hello all
Just for your info, please take into consideration for a rollback or not
descision (I am neither happy with the commit, nor happy with a rollback
and therefore am 0 on rollback or not):
I have written a small checker to remove all whitespace only diffs from
the diffs on the URL be
On 2018-07-06, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> On 05/07/18 2:42 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2018-07-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>>> I personally believe that reviewing these meaningless changes is a
>>> waste of time and energy. I'm in favour of rolling back the entire
>>> commit set if that's what it take
On 05/07/18 2:42 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2018-07-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I personally believe that reviewing these meaningless changes is a
waste of time and energy. I'm in favour of rolling back the entire
commit set if that's what it takes.
+1
although reverting the commits in both b
On 2018-07-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I personally believe that reviewing these meaningless changes is a
> waste of time and energy. I'm in favour of rolling back the entire
> commit set if that's what it takes.
+1
although reverting the commits in both branches and merging back the
1.9.x branch
On 05/07/18 12:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Gintas,
- passfile="testpassfile.tmp"%/>
+ passfile="testpassfile.tmp"/>
the commit that introduced the issue was labeled "Trailing whitespace"
and I trusted to contain exactly that and didn't bother reviewing
it. Obviously it did not.
A s
Gintas,
> - passfile="testpassfile.tmp"%/>
> + passfile="testpassfile.tmp"/>
the commit that introduced the issue was labeled "Trailing whitespace"
and I trusted to contain exactly that and didn't bother reviewing
it. Obviously it did not.
A single commit that spans a dozen mail messag
11 matches
Mail list logo
