RE: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

2006-11-17 Thread Burgess, Benjamin
PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head] Hello Kevin and others, I have read manifestations of interest from two persons who contributed to these tasks so far. So finding 3 people might work for Starteam. What I am wondering about

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

2006-11-06 Thread Kevin Jackson
What I am wondering about is : would we remove the Starteam tasks from Ant 1.7.1 for instance ? or have them both in Ant 1.7.1 and in the antlib ? I'd think that there would need to be a changeover period where starteam was available in ant and as a separate antlib (say for 1.7.1), but also note

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

2006-11-06 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Kevin and others, I have read manifestations of interest from two persons who contributed to these tasks so far. So finding 3 people might work for Starteam. What I am wondering about is : would we remove the Starteam tasks from Ant 1.7.1 for instance ? or have them both in Ant 1.7.1 and in

Re: Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

2006-11-06 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi Antoine (et al).. what would be the process to move the starteam code to become an antlib ? I think just adding the antlib xml, and changing the package name of the starteam code is strictly all that's necessary. The hard part is getting enough support to push it through the sandbox into a

Possible Starteam Antlib [WAS RE: Unit tests results with current head]

2006-11-06 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
:11:06 -0500 Von: "Burgess, Benjamin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Ant Developers List" Betreff: RE: Unit tests results with current head > While I am not a committer, I am basically the contributor who took over > the StarTeam tasks as near as I can tell. I

RE: Unit tests results with current head

2006-11-06 Thread Burgess, Benjamin
tests results with current head Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > We should also move the starteam tasks to an antlib or or find another project wanting to have them so that we sometime reach the situation where an automated process (gump ?) could build a release candidate of ant legally on

Re: Unit tests results with current head

2006-11-03 Thread Steve Cohen
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: We should also move the starteam tasks to an antlib or or find another project wanting to have them so that we sometime reach the situation where an automated process (gump ?) could build a release candidate of ant legally on an ASF computer. Regards, Antoine --

Unit tests results with current head

2006-11-03 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I just built and run the tests of the current SVN head under Windows XP, Cygwin, IBM JDK 1.4.1. I have these failures/errors : in the Antunit unit tests : jar-spi-test_xml test-simple Failure Assertion failed at line 29 , column 20 it turned out to be some kind of problem of line end