2. Mai 2006 18:22
>> An: Ant Developers List
>> Betreff: Re: Summer Of Code
>>
>> Speaking personally, I think the documentation project has
>> great value for the Ant community. I consider Dominique
>> Devienne's gendoc proposal to be a viable "seed&
On 03/05/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am interesting in participating in the Google Summer of Code on the
mentoring side.
But I did not do my homework yet to find out what we need to do (as
Apache Ant), in order to be able to welcome participants.
R
Hello,
I am interesting in participating in the Google Summer of Code on the
mentoring side.
But I did not do my homework yet to find out what we need to do (as
Apache Ant), in order to be able to welcome participants.
Regards,
Antoine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last year we had a suggest
elopers List
>Betreff: Re: Summer Of Code
>
>Speaking personally, I think the documentation project has
>great value for the Ant community. I consider Dominique
>Devienne's gendoc proposal to be a viable "seed"; it is
>(usually, I am having trouble with s
hchiev, and I am a student
> at the Sofia
> University, Bulgaria. I am writing to you in
> connection with Google's
> this-year Summer Of Code. For I have been taking
> part in the users
> mail list and I read there about the HTTP
> tasks(tasks that should
> execute
Hello,
My name is Petar Toshev Tahchiev, and I am a student at the Sofia
University, Bulgaria. I am writing to you in connection with Google's
this-year Summer Of Code. For I have been taking part in the users
mail list and I read there about the HTTP tasks(tasks that should
execute HTTP me
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Do they have to sign a CLA?
>>
>>Anybody who wants to contribute a significant amount of code to the
>>ASF must.
>
> I think they will reach that significance :-)
Then we'll either need an individual CLA (and maybe even a corporate
C
>> As we have a SVN repository, could create a module for this? With
>> write access to all Ant committers and the students working on that?
>
>If those students were Apache committers, yes. Otherwise, we can't.
Mmh. Creating a project at sourceforge and migrating the final result
into the ASF r
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we have a SVN repository, could create a module for this? With
> write access to all Ant committers and the students working on that?
If those students were Apache committers, yes. Otherwise, we can't.
> Do they have to sign a CLA?
As we have a SVN repository, could create a module for this? With write
access to all Ant committers and the students working on that?
Or one module per student?
Do they have to sign a CLA?
Because they will spent a lot more time than other "only-bugreporters"
for Ant, I think we should provide b
On Jun 6, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Stephane Bailliez wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I like the ideas of using backport175 and/or qdox. I think either
of these approaches will be much lighter and faster than using
XDoclet.
AFAIK backport175 and XDoclet both make use of qdox.
Unless XDoclet
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I like the ideas of using backport175 and/or qdox. I think either of
these approaches will be much lighter and faster than using XDoclet.
AFAIK backport175 and XDoclet both make use of qdox.
What would backport175 or XDoclet bring that cannot be done with qdox in
our c
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
As an alternative to directly using the Java 1.5 annotations you
could
user the JSR-175 backport of the annotations spec.
Also on codehaus as http://backport175.codehaus.org/
Cheers
Don
yes, except we have to deal with
Steve Loughran wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
As an alternative to directly using the Java 1.5 annotations you could
user the JSR-175 backport of the annotations spec.
Also on codehaus as http://backport175.codehaus.org/
Cheers
Don
yes, except we have to deal with building on OSS javac compiler
Don Stewart wrote:
As an alternative to directly using the Java 1.5 annotations you could
user the JSR-175 backport of the annotations spec.
Also on codehaus as http://backport175.codehaus.org/
Cheers
Don
yes, except we have to deal with building on OSS javac compilers; I dont
think jikes is
Developers List
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code, Apache ANT project ideas?
>>>
>> +1 to XDoclet; the only alternative would be Java1.5 annotations and
>> we do not want to go there.
>
I would reiterate the same thing.
> What about using qdox[1] directly rather than goi
>>>
>> +1 to XDoclet; the only alternative would be Java1.5 annotations and
>> we do not want to go there.
>
I would reiterate the same thing.
> What about using qdox[1] directly rather than going through xdoclet ?
>
> [1] - http://qdox.codehaus.org/
interesting, never have used itI would th
Steve Loughran wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Doug - I've added it as project ID ant-xdocs to that wiki page. As
for technologies - I'm not sure if Velocity and XDoclet are the best
technologies to use right now. Let's solicit input from others here
on their architecture ideas.
+1 to XDoc
/testcases/
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 02:05
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: Google Summer of Code, Apache ANT project ideas?
On Jun 3, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Daniels, Doug wrote:
> Yeah I was way off on Velocit
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Doug - I've added it as project ID ant-xdocs to that wiki page. As for
technologies - I'm not sure if Velocity and XDoclet are the best
technologies to use right now. Let's solicit input from others here on
their architecture ideas.
+1 to XDoclet; the only alternati
On Jun 3, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Daniels, Doug wrote:
Yeah I was way off on Velocity I thought it was part of XDocs but
really its that servlet engine.
You weren't really far off. There is DVSL transformations in the
current mix which is Velocity. Velocity isn't a bad choice
necessarily. I
2:09 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code, Apache ANT project ideas?
Doug - I've added it as project ID ant-xdocs to that wiki page. As
for technologies - I'm not sure if Velocity and XDoclet are the best
technologies to use right now. Let's solicit in
riday, June 03, 2005 2:09 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code, Apache ANT project ideas?
Doug - I've added it as project ID ant-xdocs to that wiki page. As
for technologies - I'm not sure if Velocity and XDoclet are the best
technologies to use right now. Let&
Doug - I've added it as project ID ant-xdocs to that wiki page. As
for technologies - I'm not sure if Velocity and XDoclet are the best
technologies to use right now. Let's solicit input from others here
on their architecture ideas.
Erik
On Jun 3, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Daniels, Doug wrot
On 6/3/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug - glad you're interested in the SoC.
>
> One idea that would be tremendously helpful to Ant would be to revamp
> the documentation system such that task/type documentation is auto-
> generated. I started the proposal/xdocs project several
Erik,
Sounds great, maybe you can submit it on the Apache SoC proposal
page(http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2005), and I'll submit my
application to google with Apache as my selected organization.
I guess I'd propose it something like:
The Apache Ant project needs a way to auto-gener
project for the
summer. Apache is taking project ideas from Apache members for the
summer of code (http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2005),
so I didn't know if any ANT developers had any interesting bugs,
feature requests, etc. that would be a good 1 or 2 month
development
but I've never been able to get motivated
enough. Now Google is running a "Summer of Code" program for students
(http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html).
Basically the student accepts a proposed project from a participating open
source sponsor (IE: Apache), then they pick
28 matches
Mail list logo
