Re: SVN and optional tasks

2005-03-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As Stefan's recent Bugzilla activity shows, we > have a > > lot of outstanding bugreps on SCM tasks. > > I hope that's not all that it shows (I mean, I'm > also fixing a few > bugs,

Re: SVN and optional tasks

2005-03-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Stefan's recent Bugzilla activity shows, we have a > lot of outstanding bugreps on SCM tasks. I hope that's not all that it shows (I mean, I'm also fixing a few bugs, not just moving them 8-) > This raises the question of library p

SVN and optional tasks

2005-03-16 Thread Matt Benson
As Stefan's recent Bugzilla activity shows, we have a lot of outstanding bugreps on SCM tasks. This, coupled with the recent ant libraries vote, leads me to think that our svn structure should from inception include libraries for the SCM optional task families, and that commit access should be giv