Le 26 févr. 2012 à 18:12, Mansour Al Akeel a écrit :
> Java is widely used and accepted. Scala is functional and it could be more
> suitable for a build system, however, I don't see enough reasons for the
> core to be written with scala or any other language.
> I think it's better to keep it in j
Java is widely used and accepted. Scala is functional and it could be more
suitable for a build system, however, I don't see enough reasons for the
core to be written with scala or any other language.
I think it's better to keep it in java, and allow the addition of plugins
written in other languag
Hi there,
how about rewriting Ant 2.0 using Scala? Scala appears to be well
suited as a scripting language. Charged with a scripting language, I
could write low level macros on the fly.
// Wolfgang
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> I thought I'd expand on why I got so e
I thought I'd expand on why I got so excited about NIO 2.0 and JSR 203
as well as the other changes in Java 7. I can see I have done a bad job
of selling the benefits of a refactoring for potential volunteers.
Reading through the changes that were introduced in Java 7, it seems to
me that Ant w
