Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

2003-12-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
I am following this thread. I'm glad Peter got past his original issue. I don't have much bandwidth at the moment to spend on this, but will help as I can. On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, at 04:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:\ @ant.internal=true Internal setters not to be documented in the

Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

2003-12-10 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks Jan. As Antoine pointed out, the feature is implemented. ( use of @ant.attribute.group) and there is examples in the code base. I will look at the threads. Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Disregard my previous e-mail on this. I have figured out the problems I had. However, looking at the ge

RE: xdoclet and the generated html files

2003-12-10 Thread Jan . Materne
> Disregard my previous e-mail on this. I have figured out the problems > I had. However, looking at the generated files, for subant and > whichresource, > a new (needed) column has been added for attributes - whether they are > required or not. How does one specify this and how does one specify

Re: xdoclet and the generated html files

2003-12-10 Thread Peter Reilly
Disregard my previous e-mail on this. I have figured out the problems I had. However, looking at the generated files, for subant and whichresource, a new (needed) column has been added for attributes - whether they are required or not. How does one specify this and how does one specify that one o