Re: that svn task

2005-02-17 Thread Martin van den Bemt
There is a small typo : vor instead of for :) Mvgr, Martin Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't used it yet but have you seen: http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html It might be an easier route to svn support! Sorry if that pours water on yo

Re: that svn task

2005-02-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't used it yet but have you seen: > http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html > > It might be an easier route to svn support! > > Sorry if that pours water on your fire :( It doesn't. See the README[1] if placed into the sandb

Re: that svn task

2005-02-11 Thread Rob Oxspring
I haven't used it yet but have you seen: http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html It might be an easier route to svn support! Sorry if that pours water on your fire :( Rob Stefan Bodewig wrote: is more-or-less done. While I worked on the task I realized how limited the original cvs task actually is,