Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-21 Thread Steve Loughran
Peter Reilly wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: This is me running build.sh test or ant test from ant CVS_HEAD; CLASSPATH is empty. or should be. I will take a look. Did you do rm -rf bootstrap build before doing ./build.sh test not the bootstrap, but I just did that and got the same result. hmmm. Ok.

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-21 Thread Peter Reilly
Steve Loughran wrote: This is me running build.sh test or ant test from ant CVS_HEAD; CLASSPATH is empty. or should be. I will take a look. Did you do rm -rf bootstrap build before doing ./build.sh test Peter - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is me running build.sh test or ant test from ant CVS_HEAD; > CLASSPATH is empty. or should be. I will take a look. CLASSPATH points to lib/optional/junit.jar, Sun's JDK 1.4.2_04 on RedHat 7.3 (yes, outdated, I know), no problem

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-21 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone else seen this? Something like this in strange classloader setups. Are you forking ? Are parts of Ant or build/classes or build/testcases on your CLASSPATH? You get a method like this when a class tries t

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone else seen this? Something like this in strange classloader setups. Are you forking ? Are parts of Ant or build/classes or build/testcases on your CLASSPATH? You get a method like this when a class tries to invoke a protect

RE: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I thought "Ljava/lang/String" would be referring > to a > > String[], but there is no such method > > No Ljava/lang/String; is String, > whereas [Ljava/lang/String; is String[]. --DD > Gotcha, t

RE: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-20 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I thought "Ljava/lang/String" would be referring to a > String[], but there is no such method > "void expectLog(String[], String[])", only > "void expectLog(String, String)". > > If I am not mistaken about the significance of the > "L", I suppose thi

Re: tests failing w/ illegal access error

2004-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
Never seen anything like it... but am I crazy here? I thought "Ljava/lang/String" would be referring to a String[], but there is no such method "void expectLog(String[], String[])", only "void expectLog(String, String)". If I am not mistaken about the significance of the "L", I suppose this would

Re: tests failing

2003-03-10 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 00:22 Subject: Re: tests failing > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i have been lax on runnin

Re: tests failing : red herring

2003-03-10 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Now I found the culprit for these failing tests. I was starting the tests on the cygwin prompt with "./build.sh run-single-test" It seems that the tests were then done with the bootstrap directory, which was old. I removed my bootstrap directory, rebuilt everything, and now everything is fine. Your

Re: tests failing

2003-03-10 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
testCreateWithEmptyFileset by wrapping the src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/Jar.xml in a small java main. Antoine - Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:22 AM Subject: Re: tests failing > On Sun, 9 Mar 200

Re: tests failing

2003-03-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have been lax on running tests for a while; now I am seeing (on > winXP, single CPU) Is this from CVS HEAD? Looks like the bug Nico's patch was supposed to fix (i.e.