Re: scripting

2006-06-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> About property expansion - many languages use the same syntax for >>> inline property substitution. It may be good not to expand >>> pro

Re: scripting

2006-06-26 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: About property expansion - many languages use the same syntax for inline property substitution. It may be good not to expand properties automatically. That's the reason it hasn't been implemented, exactly.

Re: scripting

2006-06-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > About property expansion - many languages use the same syntax for > inline property substitution. It may be good not to expand > properties automatically. That's the reason it hasn't been implemented, exactly. Just imagine a scr

Re: scripting

2006-06-23 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
About property expansion - many languages use the same syntax for inline property substitution. It may be good not to expand properties automatically. - Alexey. On 6/23/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Having been doing some work documenting scripting recently, I want to note som