jonathan gold wrote:
hi. i'm getting back to this now, and saw that there were a few more
responses. to answer your question -- it's the latter. i've gone the xml
route. the problem is that i have many modules interacting to build a
project, and it's difficult, though not impossible, to do
> From: jonathan gold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we are looking at the problem the wrong way.
> > What is what people want to do?
> > Do they want to programatically create some project and then
> > as an after thought they decide to serialize it to
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Loughran wrote:
Even if you could retro-fit every task out there with getters,
-what about overloaded set operatons? which one should
the get return?
-what about property assignments. Tasks get their setter
Jack Woehr wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
Even if you could retro-fit every task out there with getters,
-what about overloaded set operatons? which one should the get return?
-what about property assignments. Tasks get their setters with
properties expanded.
also there is the issue of add
> From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> > Even if you could retro-fit every task out there with getters,
> > -what about overloaded set operatons? which one should
> the get return?
> > -what about property assignments. Tasks get their setters with
> > pro
Jack Woehr wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
Even if you could retro-fit every task out there with getters,
-what about overloaded set operatons? which one should the get return?
-what about property assignments. Tasks get their setters with
properties expanded.
Hmm. Ah, well. Writing out th
Maybe it is better not to write the project at all, but construct it
on a fly and execute it right a way. Of cause, if project creation is
slow, you might want to cache the result. In that case, maybe you can
log all actions in your own format and do not create ANT XML.
- Alexey.
On 8/6/05, jona
Steve Loughran wrote:
Even if you could retro-fit every task out there with getters,
-what about overloaded set operatons? which one should the get return?
-what about property assignments. Tasks get their setters with
properties expanded.
Hmm. Ah, well. Writing out the project seems to b
Jack Woehr wrote:
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
One of the problems here is that it is not always possible
to reconstruct the XML for a particular TASK. That is,
tasks MUST have setXXX methods for every attribute, but there is
no requirement that they provide a corresponding getXXX.
Simillar fo
Jack Woehr wrote:
Conor MacNeill wrote:
jonathan gold wrote:
are there libraries i've somehow missed in the ant api that allow me to
take a Project object i've built programmatically and write it as an
antfile to some OutputStream?
You have not missed anything as there are no librarie
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello Jack,
I think that it is as you said an "entrepreneurial opportunity", I am not
sure whether any committer would try to do it.
Well, it can't be done without the cooperation of the committers because
it implies (henceforth and for all time) a requirement for
August 08, 2005 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: programmatically creating and marshalling antfiles
> Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
>
> >One of the problems here is that it is not always possible
> >to reconstruct the XML for a particular TASK. That is,
> >tasks MUST have setXXX meth
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
One of the problems here is that it is not always possible
to reconstruct the XML for a particular TASK. That is,
tasks MUST have setXXX methods for every attribute, but there is
no requirement that they provide a corresponding getXXX.
Simillar for create, addXX
> From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
> >jonathan gold wrote:
> >
> >
> >>are there libraries i've somehow missed in the ant api that
> allow me
> >>to take a Project object i've built programmatically and
> write it as
> >>an antfile to some OutputStream
Conor MacNeill wrote:
jonathan gold wrote:
are there libraries i've somehow missed in the ant api that allow me to
take a Project object i've built programmatically and write it as an
antfile to some OutputStream?
You have not missed anything as there are no libraries in Ant to do
thi
jonathan gold wrote:
> are there libraries i've somehow missed in the ant api that allow me to
> take a Project object i've built programmatically and write it as an
> antfile to some OutputStream?
You have not missed anything as there are no libraries in Ant to do
this. There may be external proj
16 matches
Mail list logo
