Re: junit test

2006-10-08 Thread Peter Reilly
On 10/7/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: > The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to > crash itself when running its own test. I haven't > looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort > of way... > certainly tests are crashing the jvm on my wo

Re: junit test

2006-10-07 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to crash itself when running its own test. I haven't looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort of way... certainly tests are crashing the jvm on my work box. Junit 3.8.1, Suse linux. its an IO test that takes do

Re: junit test

2006-10-06 Thread jcumps
mixed mode) Regards, jan - Original Message - From: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:08 PM Subject: Re: junit test I think that this is because junit4 is being used. Peter On 10/6/06, Matt Be

Re: junit test

2006-10-06 Thread jcumps
From: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:08 PM Subject: Re: junit test I think that this is because junit4 is being used. Peter On 10/6/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The current state of A

Re: junit test

2006-10-06 Thread Peter Reilly
I think that this is because junit4 is being used. Peter On 10/6/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to crash itself when running its own test. I haven't looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort of way... -Matt __

RE: junit test runner enhancements

2005-04-14 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think you cant see if a class is abstract without loading it (or using > BCEL). Load-time checking is best done in the runner, as the classpath > is all set up there. If you use BCEL (or better yet ASM since it's lighter weight and faster), y

Re: junit test runner enhancements

2005-04-14 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm thinking of what would it take to modify JUnitTestRunner to We have enhancement requests to do so in . It may be easier to write a selector. Stefan I think you cant see if a class is abstract without loading

Re: junit test runner enhancements

2005-04-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking of what would it take to modify JUnitTestRunner to We have enhancement requests to do so in . It may be easier to write a selector. Stefan - To uns

Re: junit test runner enhancements

2005-04-13 Thread Steve Loughran
Phil Weighill Smith wrote: Steve, I've not written any code to help here, but thought the following issue could also be considered: When executing a test class that has no test methods what-so-ever (e.g. someone comments out all tests for some reason) the runner currently barfs instead of ignoring

Re: junit test runner enhancements

2005-04-12 Thread Phil Weighill Smith
Steve, I've not written any code to help here, but thought the following issue could also be considered: When executing a test class that has no test methods what-so-ever (e.g. someone comments out all tests for some reason) the runner currently barfs instead of ignoring the test class. Phil :n.