I agree with Peter.
I think it's important that older 3th party tasks keep working with 1.x
releases of Ant.
Maarten
From: Peter Reilly
To: Ant Developers List ; gudnabr...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: depreca
Just had a quick look at Project.
There are a lot of deprecated methods. However
I do not think that most of them are deprecated correctly.
Users of the api should not have to know about implementation
details and changes to implementation - for example the
FileUtils.getFileUtils().
I downloaded t
Hi Peter,
So does that mean you would be opposed to removing these deprecated items?
Matt
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Peter Reilly
wrote:
> The only problem is the there are a lot
> of tasks out there in the wild that have not
> been compiled in a very long time. (I know
> I have uses a n
The only problem is the there are a lot
of tasks out there in the wild that have not
been compiled in a very long time. (I know
I have uses a number), These
will most likely use the deprecated methods,
especially in regard to handling of properties
and references.
Peter
2012/8/20 Martin Gainty :
On 08/20/2012 01:52 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
There are lots of methods in Ant's source that have been deprecated since e.g.
v1.6. Does anyone object to removing deprecated methods for Ant 1.9?
I think OK so long as you are talking about members in the Java API - I guess
we are still keeping co
Hi Matt
as long as there is a new method (or new class) to replace the deprecated
method (or deprectaed class)
Many Thanks for your diligence!
Martin
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist v
