Hi
Unless anyone objects within the next few days I will apply a patch that
will make use of getFileUtils instead of newFileUtils
in all files in a uniform way (122 files impacted).
I have manually checked if it could do any harm when using the same
instance of the FileUtils everywhere and could
Thanks Jan, I was afraid I was forgetting something.
:(
-Matt
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jhm 2004/08/31 22:38:54
>
> Modified:
> src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java
> Log:
> Let compile.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.73 +2 -3
> ant/src/m
Hello Jan,
I thought we wanted to have fields always private.
This is what checkstyle checks.
Cheers,
Antoine
> jhm 2004/09/01 00:02:23
>
> Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
> Copy.java
> Log:
> Let compile.
>
> Revi
On 19 May 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't remove basedirectories of s that just happen to be
> matched completely.
This introduces a backwards incompatibility and maybe even
inconsistency, that's why I haven't closed the bug report yet. I'm
asking for feedback here.
The bug report
On 28 Mar 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - public void setFailOnError(boolean failonerror) {
> - this.failonerror = failonerror;
> - }
> +public void setFailOnError(boolean failonerror) {
> +this.failonerror = failonerror;
> +}
I have no idea wha
