Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java

2005-04-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On 19 Apr 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> + nt for Microsoft Windows NT-based systems, >>> + including Windows 2000,>>> + XP and >>> + successors >> winnt or windowsnt, please >> > > Y

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java

2005-04-20 Thread Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stevel 2005/04/19 15:23:39 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks conditions.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition Os.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java Log: Os gets -specific test for nt based syst

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java

2005-04-20 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 19 Apr 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: + nt for Microsoft Windows NT-based systems, including Windows 2000, XP and + successors winnt or windowsnt, please Your opinion is noted. How about winnt ? -steve ---

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java

2005-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> + nt for Microsoft Windows NT-based > systems, including Windows 2000, XP and > >> + successors > > > > > > winnt or windowsnt, please > > > > Your opinion

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java

2005-04-20 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Steve Loughran wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stevel 2005/04/19 15:23:39 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks conditions.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition Os.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java Log: Os gets -specific

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java

2005-04-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 19 Apr 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + nt for Microsoft Windows NT-based systems, including Windows 2000, > XP and > + successors winnt or windowsnt, please Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Enhance chgrp/chown? (was: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java)

2003-05-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >>>currently chmod has a fair number of additional features. >> Which are? >> > > dir, includes, excludes, defaultexcludes... Please don't! These attributes come from the pre-fileset time and are only kept for ba

Enhance chgrp/chown? (was: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java)

2003-05-21 Thread Gus Heck
Stefan Bodewig wrote: currently chmod has a fair number of additional features. Which are? dir, includes, excludes, defaultexcludes... chmod supports these with it's own internal fileset. I could duplicate it into my AbstractAccessTask (I think) to produce a similar effect in my tasks, but I ha

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I plan to patch the docs to reflect this and the fact that they seem > to accept the verbose atribute as well. Thanks, I forgot they extended ExecuteOn. I'll take care of myself. Think that's all. > Other things I have noticed is that

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java

2003-05-20 Thread Gus Heck
I noticed that this effects the chgrp and chown tasks... which also Extend ExcecuteOn and therefore now have the maxparallel atribute as well. I plan to patch the docs to reflect this and the fact that they seem to accept the verbose atribute as well. Other things I have noticed is that a littl