On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess there has to be an ilasm on the system,
Yes, and it doesn't like the /(no)listing argument, it doesn't support
/quiet either.
> we could patch the search to look for ilasm.exe only.
There also is an ilasm.exe on Linux, so
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 24 Oct 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Needs testing on mono!
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.DotnetTest
[junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Time elapsed: 11,001 sec
[junit] Testcase: testCSC took 2,972 sec
[junit] Tes
On 24 Oct 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Needs testing on mono!
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.DotnetTest
[junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Time elapsed: 11,001 sec
[junit] Testcase: testCSC took 2,972 sec
[junit] Testcase: testCSCintr
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 6 Oct 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mono 0.28 on MacOS X comes with a JIT but fails miserably, disable
it
The usual "./configure; make; make install" incantation worked on my
Mac for Mono 0.28 this time. All tests pass with Mono 0.28 on
my Linux as well as on my Ma
On 6 Oct 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mono 0.28 on MacOS X comes with a JIT but fails miserably, disable
> it
The usual "./configure; make; make install" incantation worked on my
Mac for Mono 0.28 this time. All tests pass with Mono 0.28 on
my Linux as well as on my Mac OS X systems.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does it work?
Yes
testCSC-Mono:
[csc] compiling 2 files
[csc] WROTE SYMFILE: 2 sources, 2 methods, 3 types, 4 line numbers, 0
locals, 2 namespaces, 247 bytes of string data
[csc] OffsetTable [6
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it work?
Yes
testCSC-Mono:
[csc] compiling 2 files
[csc] WROTE SYMFILE: 2 sources, 2 methods, 3 types, 4 line numbers, 0
locals, 2 namespaces, 247 bytes of string data
[csc] OffsetTable [639 - 52:515 - 2:591
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs.
With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the
refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd
vote for no refs.
I
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs.
With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the
refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd
vote for no refs.
OK
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yup. We either want no refs, or we want the mono refs.
With /nostdlib+ and Mono refs it doesn't work (Mono tries to open the
refs in read/write mode, no idea why). So in the case of Mono I'd
vote for no refs.
> I was thinking of s
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see the default references are going to be trouble.
More trouble than I had expected.
After making sure that there was no trailing ; I get this here
[...]
[csc] /usr/lib/System.dll is out of date
[c
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see the default references are going to be trouble.
More trouble than I had expected.
After making sure that there was no trailing ; I get this here
[...]
[csc] /usr/lib/System.dll is out of date
[csc] /usr/lib/corli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2003/08/05 08:08:17
Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional dotnet.xml
Log:
Slowly approaching with Mono
oh, cool.
I see the default references are going to be trouble. In my intent to be
helpful in the past, I have made the present worse.
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
