Re: cvs commit: ant/docs resources.html

2005-05-30 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
If Amazon and others do not sponsor us, we can just put a single link to www.addall.com for people to find the best price. - Alexey. On 30 May 2005 15:54:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > jhm 2005/05/30 08:54:00 > > Modified: xdocs/stylesheets s

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs resources.html

2004-02-24 Thread Erik Hatcher
What you quoted was not part of the commit - it was just "around" the stuff I changed. But the JUnit article I wrote for dW ages ago is really only for Ant 1.3. This was my first foray into tweaking with Ant's code, and it morphed into enhancements to / that became part of Ant 1.4. E

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs resources.html

2004-02-24 Thread Jan . Materne
> I'm confused did something I committed say something about Ant > 1.3??? Yep: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=107761882429761&w=2 This article demonstrates an approach to the automated build and test \ process. Working with Ant 1.3 and the JUnit test framework, it shows how to a

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs resources.html

2004-02-24 Thread Erik Hatcher
I'm confused did something I committed say something about Ant 1.3??? That article I wrote was about Ant 1.5. Erik On Feb 24, 2004, at 6:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.fawcette.com/javapro/2003_02/magazine/features/ehatcher/l Working with Ant 1.3 and 02/2003, Ant 1.3 - see

RE: cvs commit: ant/docs resources.html

2004-02-24 Thread Jan . Materne
http://www.fawcette.com/javapro/2003_02/magazine/features/ehatcher/l Working with Ant 1.3 and 02/2003, Ant 1.3 - seems to be old :-) Not not invalid, ´cause basics haven´t changed (so much). Jan