Re: ant-xdocs

2005-07-08 Thread Erik Hatcher
The Summer of Code projects have already begun, so at this point it is not possible to sign on with Google to do this project. If you are interested in tackling this project anyway, you're in the right place! My recommendation is you check out Ant's codebase, try to run the xdocs build an

Re: ant xdocs proposals

2004-01-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jan 14, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: The advantage of generating the xdocs from build/classes is that it makes the development cycle a bit shorter. For instance, if you add a new task in your development workspace, then you can generate the xdocs as soon as you have compiled t

Re: ant xdocs proposals

2004-01-14 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Stefan Bodewig wrote: "You guys" includes you, Antoine, as all Apache committers have commit access to the Gump repository. OK - I need to study Gump. or discuss a way forward to get this built ? I'd propose to set up a second xdocs project with the xdoclet dependencies replaced by entries

Re: ant xdocs proposals

2004-01-14 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Erik Hatcher wrote: But this is precisely the purpose of Gump, to find where the chain of dependencies break that are hopefully transient because of inter-project miscommunication or worse. In the current run it looks like JavaCC failed to build which is what underlies xjavadoc. Fair enough. W

RE: ant xdocs proposals

2004-01-13 Thread Jan . Materne
> > So could one of you guys fix the descriptors > > "You guys" includes you, Antoine, as all Apache committers have commit > access to the Gump repository. Ui, didn´t knew that. > > or discuss a way forward to get this built ? > > I'd propose to set up a second xdocs project with the xdoclet

Re: ant xdocs proposals

2004-01-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have noticed that ant xdocs proposals is failing on most gump > instances, Largely because xdoclet fails to build. > Normally the jar files which should be used for this build are > checked in in the ant repository under pr

Re: ant xdocs proposals

2004-01-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jan 12, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: This one http://nagoya.apache.org/~rubys/gump/ant-xdocs-proposal.html is complaining about missing prereqs Missing prereq |/tmp/gump/xdoclet/target/lib/xdoclet-20040112.jar| from xdoclet