Ant has historically catered to the "lowest common denominator." I
agree that that level has progressed to at least Java 5, but all
things considered I don't think we'd gain that much from a bump all
the way up to 6.
Matt
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> At least.
>
> If the
At least.
If there are any compelling API which weren't introduced until 1.6
(there are in concurrency areas, but I'm not sure about anything Ant
would use), then I'd say require 1.6.
1.5 is actually quite ancient at this point. If you're not on at least
1.6, then I have to assume you're fi
Personally I think that ant should move to java 1.5 for ant 1.9.
Peter
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ZIP64 is the nickname for the changes to the ZIP archive format that are
> necessary to support files > 4GB (both individual entries and complete
> archives
