Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-07 Thread Steve Loughran
Kev Jackson wrote: Since this problem seems to have been around for 6+ years now, I vote that we switch off these unit tests and move on. [Vote] WebLogic Rmic tool sucks so: [X] enough already, we need ant 1.7.1 released regardless of crappy 3rd party tools that have never worked properly

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-07 Thread Peter Reilly
We do not need a vote for this. I think that you should just remove the test and document. Peter On 11/7/07, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > or we have a vote. > > > > One thing is clear: weblogic rmic was broken on ant1.7.0. nobody noticed. > > > Well I've just tested with Ant

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-06 Thread Kev Jackson
Hi, or we have a vote. One thing is clear: weblogic rmic was broken on ant1.7.0. nobody noticed. Well I've just tested with Ant 1.6.5 (from svn), and I get exactly the same error: [rmic] RemoteTimestampImpl must be a remote interface implementation and should exist in the classpath

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Kev Jackson wrote: Hi, We need to ship ant-weblogic.jar for ant 1.7.1. (Unless we vote to drop it from that release). We will not ship it in ant 1.8.0. That means that somehow I have to get the build to create the ant-weblogic.jar or we have a vote. One thing is clear: weblogic rmic was

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-06 Thread Kev Jackson
Hi, We need to ship ant-weblogic.jar for ant 1.7.1. (Unless we vote to drop it from that release). We will not ship it in ant 1.8.0. That means that somehow I have to get the build to create the ant-weblogic.jar I can only assume that the test tests the behavior of an old version of weblo

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-06 Thread Peter Reilly
On 11/6/07, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I meant the creation of the ant-weblogic.jar. > > Well I don't think that's a problem anyway as test case clearly calls > the weblogic rmic tool and clearly executes before failing to find the > test class - I guess we don't ship an ant

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-06 Thread Kev Jackson
Hi, I meant the creation of the ant-weblogic.jar. Well I don't think that's a problem anyway as test case clearly calls the weblogic rmic tool and clearly executes before failing to find the test class - I guess we don't ship an ant-weblogic.jar anymore Does it work with JDK5? Nope, it

Re: Update [was Re: weblogic rmic]

2007-11-06 Thread Peter Reilly
On 11/6/07, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > You probally need an old version of weblogic*.jar > > By this do you mean that an old version of weblogic*.jars will remove > the problem I'm having getting a clean set of tests? Or do you mean that > the older jars will create the ant-we