Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My issue comes from my build system architecture:
>> - a main Ant project parse a XML configuration file which is a Ant build
>> file
>> itself, and where I would like to make available custom DataType in a
>> specific antlib/namespace
>>
Yves Martin wrote:
Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have also found another issue in my code: my 'typedef' is done in a "child"
Ant Project... not in the parent Ant Project which uses this type.
Is there a "standard" way to propagate typedef/taskdef/antlib from a project
to another
Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have also found another issue in my code: my 'typedef' is done in a
>> "child"
>> Ant Project... not in the parent Ant Project which uses this type.
>> Is there a "standard" way to propagate typedef/taskdef/antlib from a project
>> to another pr
Yves Martin wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Yves,
AFAIK add(DataType) would work. This would map any nested element
containing a type defined using typedef, which is an instance of DataType.
addDataType(DataType) implies that you are mapping the
nested element
Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Yves,
>
> AFAIK add(DataType) would work. This would map any nested element
> containing a type defined using typedef, which is an instance of DataType.
>
> addDataType(DataType) implies that you are mapping the
> nested element to adding d
I think you are looking for "add(DataType)"...
--
Jeffrey E. Care ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WebSphere v7 Release Engineer
WebSphere Build Tooling Lead (Project Mantis)
Yves Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/05/2005 06:23:47 AM:
>
> Hello,
>
> I find the 'addTask(Task)' support really int
Hello Yves,
AFAIK add(DataType) would work. This would map any nested element
containing a type defined using typedef, which is an instance of DataType.
addDataType(DataType) implies that you are mapping the
nested element to adding datatypes in your class.
Cheers,
Antoine
Yves Martin wrote:
