Re: String -> Ressource

2007-03-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Matt Benson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not that bad. IH already favor setters for anything that's not a >

Re: String -> Ressource

2007-03-24 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I guess we'd need something dynamic, i.e. there > has to be a way to > >> register a ressource prefix with RU so that I can > hav

Re: String -> Ressource

2007-03-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I guess we'd need something dynamic, i.e. there has to be a way to >> register a ressource prefix with RU so that I can have string >> representations for my own ressource types. > > I h

Re: String -> Ressource (was Re: archivefileset resources)

2007-03-23 Thread Dominique Devienne
> --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: rule 1 of xml: nobody understands XML namespaces rule 2: anybody who says they do. still doesnt. so there are the following categories -ignorant of xmlns -vaguely aware, but doesnt understand -think they understand, but doesnt really -knows xmlns

Re: String -> Ressource (was Re: archivefileset resources)

2007-03-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe. :) But really, I appreciate your input. I have no problem admitting how clueless I am wrt xml in general and ns in particular. :| rule 1 of xml: nobody understands XML namespaces rule 2: anybody who says they do. sti

Re: String -> Ressource (was Re: archivefileset resources)

2007-03-23 Thread Matt Benson
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I think what is needed is a well-known syntax > specification for > >> specifying a string representation of > [resource-type][String to pass > >> to c

Re: String -> Ressource (was Re: archivefileset resources)

2007-03-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think what is needed is a well-known syntax specification for specifying a string representation of [resource-type][String to pass to constructor] e.g. "file?/foo/bar.baz", "url?http://www.apache.org";, "string?

Re: String -> Ressource (was Re: archivefileset resources)

2007-03-23 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think what is needed is a well-known syntax > specification for > > specifying a string representation of > [resource-type][String to pass > > to constructor] e.g. "file?/foo/bar