Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

2008-02-14 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: jeudi 14 février 2008 9:44 > > To: Ant Developers List > > Subject: Re: Store pom de

RE: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

2008-02-14 Thread Gilles Scokart
> -Original Message- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: jeudi 14 février 2008 9:44 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data > > I think we need to distinguish two kind of extra metadata: those used to

Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

2008-02-14 Thread Xavier Hanin
I think we need to distinguish two kind of extra metadata: those used to identify the module, and those which are pure information. IMO extra attributes on the info tag are good candidates for the first kind of extra meta information: - because it's how they work now - because the info tag attribut

Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

2008-02-13 Thread Gilles Scokart
I think that storing some extra free values is nice, but I'm not convinced that using real properties is a good thing. It add some complexity to the parsing of the ivy files (where can you use property, can use it inside proerty declaration for instance). If I look at maven pom, it is one of the

Re: Store pom dependency Managment in extra data

2008-02-13 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Feb 13, 2008 9:10 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the rewrite of the pom parser, I would like to store the maven > dependency > managment (and maybe also the properties) into the extra data of the > moduleRevisionId. > > That way, the corresponding ivy module descriptor would