On 10/4/06, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can it be just this?
It could but it would not save much and it would not be
to have , tags..
Peter
- Alexey.
On 10/4/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have made a patch to do this:
>
>
>
>
>
Can it be just this?
- Alexey.
On 10/4/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have made a patch to do this:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40678
Peter
On 9/27/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/26/06, Matt Ben
I have made a patch to do this:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40678
Peter
On 9/27/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter: as you are the father of macrodef your opinion
> was one I was ve
On 9/26/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter: as you are the father of macrodef your opinion
was one I was very interested in getting. I'm not
sure I understood your example below. Could you
clarify, and maybe elaborate on any ideas you have of
what we might try to make macrodef mo
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would however be nicer to make macrodef
> more generic. To inject the UEs into the macro
> instance.
>
> Like:
>
>
>
> provider="@{impl}"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yes, that would indeed be very useful
Peter: as you are the father of macrodef your opinion
was one I was very interested in getting. I'm not
sure I understood your example below. Could you
clarify, and maybe elaborate on any ideas you have of
what we might try to make macrodef more generic (I
assume you mean so that it would just "w
+1,
It would however be nicer to make macrodef
more generic. To inject the UEs into the macro
instance.
Like:
Do not know if it is possible.
Peter
On 9/26/06, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Good idea, Matt.
- Alexey.
On 9/26/06, Matt Benson <[
+1 Good idea, Matt.
- Alexey.
On 9/26/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It strikes me that we don't have a utility to
declaratively build custom conditions from others;
macrodef would seem the obvious choice for, e.g.:
But the result amounts to a T
