aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:33:20 +0200
> From: jarekc...@poczta.onet.pl
> To: dev@ant.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Request - Native Java "Script" Support
>
> W dniu 2012-09-20 13:55, Anders Rundgren pisze:
> > I haven&#
W dniu 2012-09-20 13:55, Anders Rundgren pisze:
I haven't tried with Groovy script and my request is really about getting
a core feature already verified being useful in NAnt into the default Ant
installation so you can *ship build scripts to anybody* (having an upgraded
Ant NB...) without requir
On 2012-09-20 18:45, Jeffrey E Care wrote:
> Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 09:27:10
> AM:
>
>> I guess I knew that this idea wouldn't get a big hooray...
>>
>> If you had tried NAnt you would probably agree that in-line Java
>> is cooler than custom tasks because you (can) have the entire
Some years ago Stefan Bodewig and Jan Materne worked on this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/javafront/
YMMV
Matt
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Jeffrey E Care wrote:
> Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 09:27:10
> AM:
>
>> I guess I knew that this idea wouldn't get a big hoo
Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 09:27:10
AM:
> I guess I knew that this idea wouldn't get a big hooray...
>
> If you had tried NAnt you would probably agree that in-line Java
> is cooler than custom tasks because you (can) have the entire script
> in one file.
>
> The proposal wasn't to sa
On 2012-09-20 15:11, Jeffrey E Care wrote:
> Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 07:55:13
> AM:
>
>> I haven't tried with Groovy script and my request is really about getting
>> a core feature already verified being useful in NAnt into the default Ant
>> installation so you can ship build script
Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 07:55:13
AM:
> I haven't tried with Groovy script and my request is really about
getting
> a core feature already verified being useful in NAnt into the default
Ant
> installation so you can ship build scripts to anybody (having an
upgraded
> Ant NB...) wit
On 2012-09-20 13:21, Vimil Saju wrote:
> Hi Anders,
>
> Have you tried groovy script? I think groovy is completely compatible with
> java.
> That is any valid java code is valid groovy code too.
Hi Vimil,
I guess you refer to: http://groovy.codehaus.org ?
I haven't tried with Groovy script and
Hi Anders,
Have you tried groovy script? I think groovy is completely compatible with
java. That is any valid java code is valid groovy code too.
From: Anders Rundgren
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:11 AM
Subject: Request - Nativ
On 04/15/2012 06:53 PM, Phillip Meyer wrote:
If any list like this already exists, please let me know.
Not that I know of, though the section of the manual that deals with extending or embedding Ant at the Java level [1] refers to a variety of types which would generally
be thought of as "core
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What I'd like from autocreated stuff is
> > -readable docs
> > -ability to include samples
> > -linking to nested types
> > -index docs
> > -ease of use by other projects that create ant tasks.
> >
> > we are not there -yet.
>
> Dont forget a
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Keep us posted on what you come up with! I created proposal/xdocs to
generate the task reference appendix in JDwA, and tossed it out there as
a possible way to document tasks/types in the hopes it would get more
attention that it has. I believe Steve has used it to generate
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> >But reinventing the wheel or not, the fact remains that the
additional
> >accessors I'm requesting in IntrospectionHelper are needed for any
> >solution that doesn't want to re-code the attribute/nested-element
logic
> >i
Dominique Devienne wrote:
But reinventing the wheel or not, the fact remains that the additional
accessors I'm requesting in IntrospectionHelper are needed for any
solution that doesn't want to re-code the attribute/nested-element logic
in reverse, or the whole logic of the add[Configured](Class) e
On Aug 17, 2004, at 11:51 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant
tasks/types.
Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation
gen
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant
tasks/types.
> Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation
> generation was done? How much of what you're d
Dominique,
Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation
generation was done? How much of what you're doing is reinventing what
was done there? Sounds almost identical. I leveraged
IntrospectionHelper as well as the XDoclet object model to get all the
info I needed.
Conor MacNeill wrote:
I don't really see a need to abbreviate those options. You're going to be
typing in a classname anyway so no big savings.
I would add -p for -projecthelp because it is a common operation
+1 for an abbreviation for this; -ph is ok with me
-version is not a common operation
And tomorrow not as error :-)
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:56 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: Request: "ant -projecthelp" is way too complicated!
>
>
> &g
>
> Additional -h for -help?
> I will do that.
>
You know if you use -h you do get help :-) Just joking.
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't really see a need to abbreviate those options. You're
> going to be
> typing in a classname anyway so no big savings.
yep, sounds right.
> I would add -p for -projecthelp because it is a common operation
> -version is not a common operation so no need for an
> abbreviation. Likewi
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:57 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that:
> >
> > I think each option should have a full work version and
> > optionally a single
> > letter shortcut. I don't like the a
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that:
> >
>
> I think each option should have a full work version and
> optionally a single
> letter shortcut. I don't like the abbreviations.
>
> Conor
Some suggestions for
-logfile
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that:
>
I think each option should have a full work version and optionally a single
letter shortcut. I don't like the abbreviations.
Conor
---
I want to introcude some "shortcuts". How about that:
present:
-quiet, -q be extra quiet
-verbose, -v be extra verbose
-logfile use given file for log
-l ''
-buildfile use given buildfile
-file ''
-f
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 07:06 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
when build.properties contains
j2ee.home=J:/J2EE/j2ee_sdk_win
ant builds correctly
When build.properties contains
j2ee.home=J:\J2EE\j2ee_sdk_win
ant doesnt build because it cannot resolve JAVA_HOME
PLEASE make the forward and back sl
Will do-
-Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: Request
> Martin,
> you should write :
> j2ee.home=J:\\J2
Martin,
you should write :
j2ee.home=J:\\J2EE\\j2ee_sdk_win
properties are read with java.util.Properties#load
the backslash must be escaped.
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:06 AM
Subject: R
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now,
I'm sure, too.
if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever.
Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no?
I s
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now,
I'm sure, too.
> if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever.
Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no?
> >Please note that
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Dear Mr. Gabor
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Rene Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would you have an Ant Manual in pdf that we can download? Thank you
very very much for your kindest assistance.
Unfortunately there is no PDF version of the Ant manual. Ant's manual
is currently creat
Dear Mr. Gabor
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Rene Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you have an Ant Manual in pdf that we can download? Thank you
> very very much for your kindest assistance.
Unfortunately there is no PDF version of the Ant manual. Ant's manual
is currently created from static HT
> From: Apache Software Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you
>
> not sure where to send this.. will someone get it to the right
> ant people? thanks.
>
> acked.
> --
> Th
33 matches
Mail list logo
