On Mon, 15 May 2006, Powell Hazzard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan wrote:
>> I'd expect them to return EXIT_SUCCESS or EXIT_FAILURE which are
>> defined to be 1 and 0 respectively if I recall my OpenVMS C
>> knowledge correctly (which hasn't been used for eight years now).
>
>Your knowle
Stefan wrote:
>>>... and break backwards compatibility with 1.6. I'd rather introduce
the flip but make it default to Ant 1.6's behavior.
I understand, hence we original suggested a property which flipped
the default behavior (Unix style or 1.6 behavior OpenVMS style). See:
http://issues.apac
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prior to ant1.6, the unix model was all that ant had. so it worked
> on all non -VMS platforms, and it worked for java apps
Correct, but as you say, this was prior to Ant 1.6.
> Then we put that patch from the OpenVMS people that s
Steve Loughran:
>>If there are some executables with unix result code logic, and other
bits with VMS rules, then its essentially >>>impossible to
"automatically"
>>>make the right decision.
>>>We could switch to unix-policy-everywhere, with a per- flip to
VMS if you want run VMS-specific apps. M
