On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I suppose that chain of events would suggest that the answer to
> your question is "yes", though "finally understood" makes the Ant
> committers sound like a bunch of dinosaurs. ;)
>
>
--- Russell Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:35:06 -0800 (PST), Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> > tasks). Unless I have misunderstood it
> dependencies
> > is more Maven-centric than so I feel
[SNIP]
> I believe that you did misunderstand it. The
> task i
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:35:06 -0800 (PST), Matt Benson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When Russell first brought his dependencies task to
> the table, I reiterated the general policy regarding
> the introduction of new tasks, especially where they
> interacted with software other than Ant (aka optional
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(edited for brevity)
> > See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10935231277&r=1&w=2
> > (particularly DD's response)
> > and
>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=109882328509244&w=2
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Benson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > It's a sign of the times...
>>
>>
>
> See:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10935231277&r=1&w=2
> (p
I think that for this to be really usefull, one would need to
use the task.
See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28228
It does have some issues (sub-projects affecting
the main project, and when ant is used in an ide)
but it's benifits outweigh the drawbacks..
For example:
jun
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:22:40 -0600, Groboclown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:27:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Also, and this is important, you dont need to use it to download
stuff.
> > Instead you can use it to manage libraries that you depend on
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:27:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, and this is important, you dont need to use it to download stuff.
> Instead you can use it to manage libraries that you depend on. (We may
> want to change behaviour to say if you dont specify a repository, that
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's a sign of the times...
>
>
See:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10935231277&r=1&w=2
(particularly DD's response)
and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=109882
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a sign of the times...
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:27:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One thing I can't find is why this is being put into ant core and not
> > an optional task. Could anyone help me out here? Thanks.
>
> It's a bootstrapping thing. If its optional, well, its optional so it
> may
>
> One thing I can't find is why this is being put into ant core and not
> an optional task. Could anyone help me out here? Thanks.
It's a bootstrapping thing. If its optional, well, its optional so it
may not be there. Which makes it a lot harder to use the task to
retrieve optional stuff.
It's a sign of the times...
-Matt
--- Groboclown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been out of the Ant developer discussions for
> about two or three
> months now (way too much going on), and I'm trying
> to get caught up on
> the repository task.
>
> One thing I can't find is why this is being
13 matches
Mail list logo
