ire IKVM to be deployed, although
>> surely there are some IKVM assemblies which will need to be available.
>> (Just as with the jvm, I don't think it would be a huge deal if it needed to
>> be.)
>>
>> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
not require IKVM to be deployed, although
> surely there are some IKVM assemblies which will need to be available.
> (Just as with the jvm, I don't think it would be a huge deal if it needed to
> be.)
>
> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
will need to be available. (Just as with
the jvm, I don't think it would be a huge deal if it needed to be.)
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Nant version of Ivy
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Date: Thu
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any ongoing effort to produce a .NET/NAnt version of Ivy?
Are you looking for Ivy to support .NET assemblies or for a .NET
implementation of Ivy's general functionality?
If Ivy's features are enough to support .NET builds (strangely I'm
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:55 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any ongoing effort to produce a .NET/NAnt version of Ivy? (I
> suppose this would be "NIvy".)
I don't think so.
>
>
> I find myself wondering if this can be easily done by using IKVM to convert
> the
> Ivy bytecode to IL al
