Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant » Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » ubuntu,jdk_1.8_latest #128

Interesting, I'll have to have another look. Thanks Stefan! Matt On Sun, Mar 6, 2022, 6:38 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2022-02-15, Matt Benson wrote: > > > So my tests for scriptcondition return values were using beanshell > > because I couldn't figure out any way to get rhino to return a val

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant » Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » ubuntu,jdk_1.8_latest #128

On 2022-02-15, Matt Benson wrote: > So my tests for scriptcondition return values were using beanshell > because I couldn't figure out any way to get rhino to return a value > from the script. I can't understand which optional dependencies are > present during the build, where they are, nor how th

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant » Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » ubuntu,jdk_1.8_latest #128

So my tests for scriptcondition return values were using beanshell because I couldn't figure out any way to get rhino to return a value from the script. I can't understand which optional dependencies are present during the build, where they are, nor how they get there. Are they in the lib of the ac

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

> > >> Asked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16799 for > >> checking+fixing all of our jobs. > >> > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > >>> Von: Jaikiran Pai [mailto:jaiki...@apache.o

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

t;>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>> Von: Jaikiran Pai [mailto:jaiki...@apache.org] >>> Gesendet: Montag, 6. August 2018 06:45 >>> An: dev@ant.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: Jenkins-Builds failing >>> >>> Sure, will fix it this week. Right no

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

or > checking+fixing all of our jobs. > > > Jan > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Jaikiran Pai [mailto:jaiki...@apache.org] > > Gesendet: Montag, 6. August 2018 06:45 > > An: dev@ant.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Sure, will fix it this week. Right now, I don't have necessary permissions to edit it. -Jaikiran On 05/08/18 8:58 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > There's one more Jenkins job failing due to outdated Ant, Ivy Check ( > https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Ivy-check/). > Could you please chec

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

There's one more Jenkins job failing due to outdated Ant, Ivy Check ( https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Ivy-check/). Could you please check it, Jaikiran? Thanks, Gintas On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 at 15:13, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I would like to test/import a few more projects (that Nicolas mention

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

I would like to test/import a few more projects (that Nicolas mentioned in one the mails) locally into the latest upstream version of the IDE, before starting a release. I have only tested a few so far. -Jaikiran On 28/07/18 2:28 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > Thanks, Jaikiran. Would you be w

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Thanks, Jaikiran. Would you be willing to restart the release process for IvyDE now? Gintas On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 15:43, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > > On 25/07/18 6:45 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > > Almost all jobs that I know of have been taken care of now. There's a > > "Ivy-tests-Windows" job which

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

On 25/07/18 6:45 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Almost all jobs that I know of have been taken care of now. There's a > "Ivy-tests-Windows" job which is pending, but for that I need some help > from infra team. I am discussing it with them separately and I expect it > to be resolved soon. I'll fix tha

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

; -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jan Matèrne (jhm) >>>>>> [mailto:apa...@materne.de] Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2018 12:54 >>>>>> An: 'Ant Developers List' Betreff: AW: Jenkins-Builds failing >>>>>> Checked by myself that a

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>> Von: Gintautas Grigelionis [mailto:g.grigelio...@gmail.com] >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2018 10:48 >>> An: Ant Developers List >>> Betreff: Re: Jenkins-Builds failing >>> >>>

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

018 12:54 >>>>> An: 'Ant Developers List' Betreff: AW: Jenkins-Builds failing >>>>> Checked by myself that a PMC chair could do (AFAIK). Opened a >>>>> ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16799 Jan >>>>>> -Ursprü

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Builds failing >>>> >>>> Checked by myself that a PMC chair could do (AFAIK). >>>> Opened a ticket >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16799 >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>> -U

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

uld do (AFAIK). >> > Opened a ticket >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16799 >> > >> > Jan >> > >> > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> > > Von: Gintautas Grigelionis [mailto:g.grigelio...@gmail.com] >> >

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

gt; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16799 > > > > Jan > > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > > Von: Gintautas Grigelionis [mailto:g.grigelio...@gmail.com] > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2018 10:48 > > > An: Ant Developers List >

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

: Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 10:15 > > An: dev@ant.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: Jenkins-Builds failing > > > > Now that I checked the job's logs, I think that's true. We had this > > issue in Ant too (not really against Maven repos, but HTTPS hosted > > Apa

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Now that I checked the job's logs, I think that's true. We had this issue in Ant too (not really against Maven repos, but HTTPS hosted Apache infrastructure). I tried setting that property in the job, but I too don't have the necessary authorization. I don't remember if I ever had those permissions

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

My hypothesis is that Java 7 must have TLS version forced to 1.2 in order to avoid protocol errors when downloading new binaries from Maven Central because earlier versions are disabled [1] (and TLS 1.0 is the default in Java 7). Gintas 1. https://blog.pcisecuritystandards.org/are-you-ready-for-3

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Haven't checked the job, but why is this system property required to be set? -Jaikiran On 20/07/18 12:51 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > I'd like to add a Java option to Ivy builds -Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.2 but I > get > This job's current authorization strategy does not permit gintas to modi

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

I'd like to add a Java option to Ivy builds -Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.2 but I get This job's current authorization strategy does not permit gintas to modify the job configuration Gintas On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 at 19:09, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > Ant nightly is stuck on archiving for 30 hours now.

Re: Jenkins-Builds failing

Ant nightly is stuck on archiving for 30 hours now. It should be escalated, I believe that could have something to do with the last upgrade of Jenkins. Gintas On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 at 14:18, Jan Matèrne wrote: > Several of our Jenkins builds are failing: > > > > IvyDE: > > https://builds.apache.or

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

Strangely the test passes when I run it manually on the VM running Gump. I'll look into it further but am running out of time for now. Stefan On 2017-12-13, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Do let me know if there's anything I can do to help investigate > this. I'm curious myself to see what's causing this

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

Do let me know if there's anything I can do to help investigate this. I'm curious myself to see what's causing this. -Jaikiran On 13/12/17 2:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So the one final test that's still failing is th

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

On 2017-12-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> So the one final test that's still failing is this one[1]. It's >> failing consistently only on Jenkins, that too with only Java 8 >> (jdk1.8.0_131). I have tried reproducing that one locally with that >> exact Java vers

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > So the one final test that's still failing is this one[1]. It's > failing consistently only on Jenkins, that too with only Java 8 > (jdk1.8.0_131). I have tried reproducing that one locally with that > exact Java version and even the latest Java 8 and haven't b

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

So the one final test that's still failing is this one[1]. It's failing consistently only on Jenkins, that too with only Java 8 (jdk1.8.0_131). I have tried reproducing that one locally with that exact Java version and even the latest Java 8 and haven't been able to reproduce it. Before I try a

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >>> So I have now pushed a fix[1] on top of my previous changes, which >>> should accommodate both these use cases (and continue to use Java 7 >>> APIs for symlinking). >> This is very useful, many thanks. We may want to modify the manual so it >> becomes clear t

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

So I have now pushed a fix[1] on top of my previous changes, which should accommodate both these use cases (and continue to use Java 7 APIs for symlinking). This is very useful, many thanks. We may want to modify the manual so it becomes clear that overwrite will replace regular files as well.

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

On 2017-12-12, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I went back and read up both these bugzilla reports again and I now > realize that supporting one doesn't necessarily mean not supporting > the other. BZ-43426 is about letting existing file be overwritten > (irrespective of the type of the file) if the overwri

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

I went back and read up both these bugzilla reports again and I now realize that supporting one doesn't necessarily mean not supporting the other. BZ-43426 is about letting existing file be overwritten (irrespective of the type of the file) if the overwrite flag is true. BZ-58683 is about not o

Re: Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

[@Steve I'm trying to drag you in as you've been the one who brought in the change that gets contested by https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683 and maybe you recall the details better than we do.] On 2017-12-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > On 10/12/17 3:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On

Potential breaking change to symlink task [ was Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977]

On 10/12/17 3:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it. Target testCreateOverFile in the antunit test explicitly tries to replace a file with a link, doing exactly what the bugzilla report says i

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

You are right, that indeed was the issue (for one of that failing test). I have pushed a commit with this change to fix that one. -Jaikiran On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: testCreateDoubleHanging is related to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/sh

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > testCreateDoubleHanging is related to > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 judging from the > history. Here the link points to a non-existent file and Files.exists > returns false in Java8. fixed by @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ import java.io.IOExcep

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

On 2017-12-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it. Are you using Java9 locally? The test only fail for Java8 in Jenkins, this could explain the difference. The antunit tests fail for me with Java 8 as well, while the JUnit test passes.

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux » JDK 1.8 (latest) #977

I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it. -Jaikiran On 10/12/17 2:29 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: See -

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : IvyDE #319

Finally. But the build of resolve visualizer has been deactivated, the Zest plugins are not properly resolved by the build. Nicolas > Le 2 juil. 2017 à 12:01, Apache Jenkins Server a > écrit : > > See > --

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

I have now disabled the nightly job[1] and added a note to the job's description stating that the latest binaries can be obtained from the other Ivy job[2]. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-NightlyDistribution/ [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy/lastSuccessfulBuild/ -Jaikiran On 29-Ju

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

> Le 29 juin 2017 à 07:48, Jaikiran Pai a écrit : > > > On 25-Jun-2017, at 8:27 PM, Nicolas Lalevée > wrote: > >> I have made the Ivy Job also build the snapshot-bin, like the nightly. Maybe >> now the nightly is redundant. > > > I think yes, the nightly job is now probably redundant - wh

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

On 25-Jun-2017, at 8:27 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > I have made the Ivy Job also build the snapshot-bin, like the nightly. Maybe > now the nightly is redundant. I think yes, the nightly job is now probably redundant - which is fine, we can always direct users to this new job for the latest

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

I pushed a fix for this a few days back and the job is now functioning correctly. -Jaikiran On 26-Jun-2017, at 8:15 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: The retrieve failure looks like a genuine bug which might be related to one of the changes I had done in one of the PRs a while back. I’ll take a look at

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

> Dropins (or "drops" as they're called in the distributions) is what IvyDE > builds were based on all the time. I am still confounded why it worked > before and stopped working now. Yet, reading the documentation I became > convinced that the dropins must be unpacked in another location. So I jus

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

2017-06-26 13:54 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Lalevée : > > > Le 26 juin 2017 à 07:46, Gintautas Grigelionis > a écrit : > > > > If I understand the process correctly, Jenkins executes "ant > > prepare-jenkins" first, which does not work locally any more, because the > > property used to figure out where to

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

> Le 26 juin 2017 à 07:46, Gintautas Grigelionis a > écrit : > > If I understand the process correctly, Jenkins executes "ant > prepare-jenkins" first, which does not work locally any more, because the > property used to figure out where to get Ivy jar from is set to an empty > string. I wonder

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

If I understand the process correctly, Jenkins executes "ant prepare-jenkins" first, which does not work locally any more, because the property used to figure out where to get Ivy jar from is set to an empty string. I wondered what was the reason for that change. Actually, when I look at it again,

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

The retrieve failure looks like a genuine bug which might be related to one of the changes I had done in one of the PRs a while back. I’ll take a look at this today. -Jaikiran On 25-Jun-2017, at 8:27 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: Hi, I worked on the Jenkins jobs to make them work. There was som

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

> I am sorry, my memory of what I was doing back in December is incorrect. > I guess I somehow updated > configuration/org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator/bundles.info or did > something else. > Luckily, there's a simpler way, the dropins should go into their own > special directory, which need

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

2017-06-25 18:23 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Lalevée : > > [2]: please check that unpacking of drops puts files into the correct > > places (the contents should go into "features" and "plugins" directories > of > > PDE). > > I have done that already. I even checked that the placed in the plugins > directory

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

> Le 25 juin 2017 à 16:57, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit > : > > Hi, > > I worked on the Jenkins jobs to make them work. > > There was some issues with job dependencies. Following the instructions there > [1] worked. Then didn’t worked… Setting the Authorization to « Run as User who Triggered Bui

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

> Le 25 juin 2017 à 17:50, Gintautas Grigelionis a > écrit : > > [3]: the path looks wrong, it starts with "\:\:\ » I have seen that too. > [2]: please check that unpacking of drops puts files into the correct > places (the contents should go into "features" and "plugins" directories of > PDE

Re: Jenkins Jobs of Ivy/IvyDE

[3]: the path looks wrong, it starts with "\:\:\" [2]: please check that unpacking of drops puts files into the correct places (the contents should go into "features" and "plugins" directories of PDE). Gintas 2017-06-25 16:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Lalevée : > Hi, > > I worked on the Jenkins jobs to

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : IvyDE-updatesite #787

Great! Still, the build still uses the pretty old Eclipse 3.7.1, and AFAICS the newer releases do not include drops, so some other dependency resolution mechanism will be necessary should for example we start discussing GEF 4+. 2017-05-17 20:48 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Lalevée : > The build was broken b

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : IvyDE-updatesite #787

The build was broken because Ant was requiring a JDK 8. So I have setup the build to use the latest JDK 8. > Le 17 mai 2017 à 20:31, Apache Jenkins Server a > écrit : > > See >

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master » Open JDK 1.8 (Only on ubuntu nodes),Ubuntu #851

I will take a look too. Antoine On Apr 17, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2016-04-17, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > >> See >> > > That's pretty

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Ant-Build-Matrix-master » Open JDK 1.8 (Only on ubuntu nodes),Ubuntu #851

On 2016-04-17, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > That's pretty frustrating. SetPermissions doesn't work on Windows (and the ownedby tests are failing as well).

Re: Jenkins

Thanks Jan, Antoine On Dec 2, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > I changed the used Java version for the Jenkins job from 1.5 to 1.6 because > the last few builds failed due a UnsupportedClassVersion error. > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant_BuildFromPOMs > > > > This was easier

Re: Jenkins, Antlibs and Submodules

On 2014-07-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > If Jenkins is set up to create a fresh workspace on each build - which > I believe it is - it should work. Two things I needed to do for AntUnit's Jenkins job: * change the Ant version used from "Standard" to "latest" * activate "recursive submodule update"