+1. Thanks Nicolas.
-Jaikiran
On Monday, April 9, 2018, Nicolas Lalevée
wrote:
> The last thread about a release has been stuck in the discussion about
which PR, patch or Jira needed to be tackled before releasing. I suggest we
just move forward with the current master. I volunteer to build a 2.
2018-04-09 17:20 GMT+00:00 Nicolas Lalevée :
> The last thread about a release has been stuck in the discussion about
> which PR, patch or Jira needed to be tackled before releasing. I suggest we
> just move forward with the current master. I volunteer to build a 2.5.0-rc1.
>
> Nicolas
>
+1; mayb
The ugly thing
2018-02-27 22:40 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Grigelionis :
> 2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
>
>> [Personally I prefer discussion by email over discussion in github
>> issues.]
>>
>
> The beauty is that GitHub comments are echoed in mailing list, and, in
> case of PR mentioning
2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> [Personally I prefer discussion by email over discussion in github
> issues.]
>
The beauty is that GitHub comments are echoed in mailing list, and, in case
of PR mentioning JIRA issues, in JIRA as well.
Gintas
2018-02-19 7:35 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>
> > 2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
>
> >> On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>
> >>>- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 (has to do with choice
> of
> >>>generics, with a
Frankly, I was doubtful about the classloader change.
But, what use cases are there for java -jar ivy.jar -main ?
As I understand it, it's about resolving an artifact and lauching whatever
main class would be there in it.
So, why not bootstrapping an Ivy build in a fancy way?
But, the new classl
On 2018-02-27, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> The first round of this might not be publicly usable and we might have
> to redo the steps as and when we fix things in the release process. So
> maybe we should attempt an intermediate release before doing a 2.5.0.
As long as we stop before pushing anything i
- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/67 (a one-liner; anybody
sees some side effects?)
I don't understand the issue. Is this a documented way of using Ivy or
why would anybody expect it to be possible to invoke Ant via the Ivy
jar?
Somebody was interested enough to open a JIRA issu
On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> 2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
>> On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>>>- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 (has to do with choice of
>>>generics, with are not set in stone yet);
>> changes the generic type of a
2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> [Personally I prefer discussion by email over discussion in github
> issues.]
>
> On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>
> >- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 (has to do with choice of
> >generics, with are not set in stone yet)
[Personally I prefer discussion by email over discussion in github
issues.]
On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 (has to do with choice of
>generics, with are not set in stone yet);
changes the generic type of an argument of a public me
I suggested previously how some of the contentious issues could be dealt
with (no response AFAICS).
In the meantime, I added the following PRs asking for some discussion
- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 (has to do with choice of
generics, with are not set in stone yet);
- http
Le 4 janv. 2014 à 14:11, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit :
>
> Le 2 janv. 2014 à 17:34, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit
> :
>
>>
>> Le 2 janv. 2014 à 17:10, Charles Duffy a écrit :
>>
>>> Absolutely, then. :)
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that only members of the PMC could call a vote
>>> for a rel
Le 2 janv. 2014 à 17:34, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit :
>
> Le 2 janv. 2014 à 17:10, Charles Duffy a écrit :
>
>> Absolutely, then. :)
>>
>> I was under the impression that only members of the PMC could call a vote
>> for a release.
>
> Here is the official rules:
> http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.
Le 2 janv. 2014 à 17:10, Charles Duffy a écrit :
> Absolutely, then. :)
>
> I was under the impression that only members of the PMC could call a vote
> for a release.
Here is the official rules:
http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html
You can do a release, but it will be officially accepted only by
Absolutely, then. :)
I was under the impression that only members of the PMC could call a vote
for a release.
If that's something any committer can do, I'll gladly run the process after
your pending feature is in.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
>
> Le 30 déc.
Le 30 déc. 2013 à 19:35, Charles Duffy a écrit :
> Howdy, all --
>
> There's rather a lot of good stuff on Ivy's trunk.
Agreed.
> Any thoughts as to when
> we might be in a position to start a release candidate series?
I think any time a committer is willing to do so.
> (As there are ticket
On 2009-10-09, Maarten Coene wrote:
> No, it still doesn't work:
> [maart...@minotaur:/www/www.apache.org/dist/ant/ivy]$ ls -al
Looks good right now, all files and dirs are owned by group ant.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
0-rc2
[maart...@minotaur:/www/www.apache.org/dist/ant/ivy]$ mkdir 2.1.0
mkdir: 2.1.0: Permission denied
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Fri, October 9, 2009 9:25:33 AM
Subject: Re: Ivy release problem
On 2009-10-09, Stefan Bodewig
Thanks Stefan!
I can't check it right now neither, I'll try it again this evening.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2009 9:25:33 AM
Subject: Re: Ivy release problem
On 2009-10-09, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
&
On 2009-10-09, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I've just asked on infrastructure to get it fixed.
Joe said it has been fixed (can't check it right now).
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional co
On 2009-10-09, Maarten Coene wrote:
> I've tried to upload the Ivy artifact to the distribution site, but I
> receive a permission denied (it looks like the group/owner has changed
> of these directories?)
I assume this happened when backups have been restored after the
apachecon site hack. I'v
ok, I'll start with the release process as soon as I've fixed some problems
with my Eclipse installation...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:51:34 PM
Subject: Re: Ivy release?
idem,
+1
Nicolas
idem,
+1
Nicolas
Le 7 sept. 09 à 12:50, Gilles Scokart a écrit :
Same here,
OK for a 2.1.0 with r801820 merge, and OK for 2.1.1 without an
"external" RC
first (having zip on which to vote is a suffisent "release
candidate" step).
Thanks,
Gilles Scokart
2009/9/7 Xavier Hanin
I'm ok
Same here,
OK for a 2.1.0 with r801820 merge, and OK for 2.1.1 without an "external" RC
first (having zip on which to vote is a suffisent "release candidate" step).
Thanks,
Gilles Scokart
2009/9/7 Xavier Hanin
> I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged.
> For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC
I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged.
For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC is really necessary... If we have only bug
fixes without too heavy changes I think releasing 2.1.1 directly without
prior RC is ok. If something goes wrong we can release a 2.1.2 and that's
fine.
BTW, thanks a lot Maarte
On Jun 9, 2009, at 11:41 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
Ivy 2.1.0-RC1 has been out for some (too long?) time now. (didn't
had much time last couple of months, but it's getting better now :-))
Let's decide our next steps...
Because the RC1 is so old, I would like to create a 2.1.0-RC2 next
wee
+1
Gilles Scokart
2009/6/9 Maarten Coene
>
> Ivy 2.1.0-RC1 has been out for some (too long?) time now. (didn't had much
> time last couple of months, but it's getting better now :-))
>
> Let's decide our next steps...
>
> Because the RC1 is so old, I would like to create a 2.1.0-RC2 next week
>
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:41:59 -0700 (PDT), Maarten Coene
wrote:
>
> Ivy 2.1.0-RC1 has been out for some (too long?) time now. (didn't had
much
> time last couple of months, but it's getting better now :-))
>
> Let's decide our next steps...
>
> Because the RC1 is so old, I would like to create
Maarten Coene wrote:
>
>
> Ivy 2.1.0-RC1 has been out for some (too long?) time now. (didn't had much
> time last couple of months, but it's getting better now :-))
>
> Let's decide our next steps...
>
> Because the RC1 is so old, I would like to create a 2.1.0-RC2 next week
> containing all
30 matches
Mail list logo
