Its retained in case someone, somewhere, had subclassed the task, or
created a cvs task and cast it to tasks.Cvs.
In OSS code there is no real privacy of implementation, and we have to
try and maintain the appearance of stability in the moderately public
areas. That doesnt mean that we cant change
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:40:59 +0700, Kevin Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks like dead code as all the functionality is in
AbstractCvsTask.
>
> Would it be possible to prune this from the current version?
>
> Kev
>
Its retained in case someone, somewhere, had subclassed the task, o
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:40:59 +0700, Kevin Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks like dead code as all the functionality is in
AbstractCvsTask.
>
> Would it be possible to prune this from the current version?
>
> Kev
>
Its retained in case someone, somewhere, had subclassed the task, o
