I should probably open a Bugzilla bug on this, but I'll go ahead and post it
here to see everyone's opinion.
Here's the situation:
File testbug1.xml:
File testbug2.xml:
(assuming "m
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > From: Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > We could add back optional.jar as a manifest-only class-path jar to
> > collect all the other optional jars together.
>
> OK.
I thought of that too, even started writing it too, but it would not
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We could add back optional.jar as a manifest-only class-path jar to
> collect all the other optional jars together.
OK.
> This could be provided in lib or even a "legacy" dir for those who
> want to use it.
I'd rather move it to a
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:34 am, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Preliminary report on what I have seems with the Beta1 release of Ant 1.6.
>
> I hope this helps. --DD
>
Absolutely. It is exactly what a beta is for and I hope a lot more people can
do this level of analysis.
I'll quickly address the thi
