Yeah I suppsoe we have that possibility. If we have separate docs
though they aren't spatially related to the code (which would be a
nice feature IMO). Regarding source, we either have two separate
sources (docs + code), or we have messy code sources. Seems like it
would be better to have separa
not a case of misuse.
Cheers,
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: "Kev Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List"
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: AW: Manual + xdocs etc
>
> >>I think we should reorder the existin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested, but I need to get myself a new laptop to
start really working on ant again. My hard disk is nearly dead
:(, so I did not use my laptop since shortly after the Ant
1.6.5 release.
Good luck :-)
I think we should reorder the existing docs along the
> I think it would be possible to include the examples in the Ant source
> too - this would make it even more clear what the code is trying to
> accomplish and would hep to prevent refactorings etc that go against the
> intended use of the code.
>
> My thought would be to include at the top of the
I think we should reorder the existing docs along the
structure which I think Erik Hatcher had conceived and which
is incarned by the @ant.category tags in the source code (scm,
packaging, ...).
A "complete" list of these tags would be helpful ...
Agreed.
I am still interested
Hi Jan,
You probably want to take me off your e-mail list. I believe the previous
Richard Evans was in the UK. However, I am in the US and likely in a different
organization all together.
Cheers, - Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed
