Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- since we will be releasing both to the maven directory tree and
using our usual distribution system, does the release manager also
need to upload the java-repository directory tree, maybe as a zip
fi
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This procedure for releases opens for me a number of questions :
>
> - does it not force the project to actually hold two votes, one to
> choose a date to build a release candidate, the second to decide
> whether this release
Hello Stefan,
OK, maybe this does not comply with ASF procedures.
I see that tomcat seems to be doing releases the same way as what you
suggest and did for the antlib(s):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=115859000312242&w=2
This procedure for releases opens for me a number of questio
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer the procedure which I have used for Ant 1.6 and for the
> betas of 1.7 to define a release date in the vote thread, and then
> to build and publish the release "mechanically" on the release date.
I may have been a bit
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in the past we have been a bit lax on releases. We've beasically been
> voting on the source tree (yes, you can build a release on Sunday) and
> not on the files being released. Now that we are sponsoring an
> Incubator podling, we might better be a bit more st
