ok, fair enough. I sent a patch to commons-dev with a workaround for
Jelly anyway... just have to check back now if the patch was actually
noticed or not ;-)
Stefan Bodewig ::
On 26 Mar 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going to throw in the extra check in CVS HEAD later
today
On 26 Mar 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to throw in the extra check in CVS HEAD later
> today/tomorrow.
I spoke too soon. Given the javadocs:
* Stores a named nested element using a storage method determined
* by the initial introspection. If no appropria
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig ::
>> On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support
>>>the specified element.
>>
>> This is because storeElement can never be called w
Stefan Bodewig ::
On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support
the specified element.
This is because storeElement can never be called without calling
createElement before that from within Ant. It may be different f
On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support
> the specified element.
This is because storeElement can never be called without calling
createElement before that from within Ant. It may be different from
within J
