Martijn,
can change properties that are coded as attributes, but
only interacts with nested elements by adding new children to a given
reference. The task as it stands is extremely, extremely simple. Any
restrictions we care to impose would complicate it immensely--I would
again urge that we c
Hello
I have quite some difficulties with the discrepancy of the name of the
task and that what the task is about to do.
Therefore, using the current name and functionality I would cast a -0,5
vote, as i do not want to be blocking.
I can see the desire for a task that changes predeclared id's.
Same here
Dominique Devienne wrote:
1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to
be marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
+0
3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it
sho
> 1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
> 2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to
>be marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
+0
> 3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it
>should default to "false"?
+1
--DD
--
[repeating part of my vote since I didn't vote on the third question
last time]
On 2010-04-14, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> 1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
> 2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to be
> marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
-0
On 13/04/2010 3:34 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
1. Are you in favor of adding the augment feature to Ant?
+1
2. Are you in favor of an attribute that allows references to be
marked as final, to avoid augmentation?
-0
3. If a final attribute is decided upon, do you think it should
defaul
