On 2010-06-11, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 7:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> +1 - I'm not sure we must stop at the commercial task (is there any
>> reason to include the CVS tasks with Ant today?), but it will be a
>> start.
> I can add CVS to the list if there are no objections. Any o
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 7:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>> On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of
>>> Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own
On 01/06/2010 7:51 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote:
I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of
Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own
Antlibs.
+1 - I'm not sure we must stop at the commercial task (is
Hi,
> What I'd like to suggest is that we move all the tasks based on commercial
> software out of the Ant release and into their own Antlibs. This has already
> been done with the Borland Starteam tasks, and The Microsoft Visual
> Sourcesafe package has been moved but not yet released (and so old
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote:
>
>
>> I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of
>> Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own
>> Antlibs.
>>
>
> +1 - I'm not sure we must stop at the commercial task (is there a
On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of
> Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own
> Antlibs.
+1 - I'm not sure we must stop at the commercial task (is there any
reason to include the CVS tasks with Ant
