Re: ScriptDef revisited

2004-01-05 Thread Peter Reilly
distribution (optional tasks). Does the code depends on ANT1.7 features? Or is it usable in 1.6? Jose Alberto -Original Message- From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 31/12/2003 11:24 To: Ant Developers List Cc: Subject: Re: ScriptDef revisited You could try playing

RE: ScriptDef revisited

2004-01-02 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 31/12/2003 11:24 To: Ant Developers List Cc: Subject: Re: ScriptDef revisited You could try playing with beanshelldef http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=106577547220771&w=2

Re: ScriptDef revisited

2003-12-31 Thread Peter Reilly
You could try playing with beanshelldef http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=106577547220771&w=2 Peter Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Hi, my current struggle with and beanshell, made me notice how inefficient or script task is (i.e., on every execution the script is recompiled, and executed).

Re: scriptdef

2003-06-18 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:07 pm, Conor MacNeill wrote: > > No, it's a bug - I'll look into it. > Alexey, This should be fixed now. I reworked the scriptdef operation to use DynamicConfigurator and that fixed this too. Thanks for trying this out. Conor ---

Re: scriptdef

2003-06-18 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:10 am, Alexey Solofnenko wrote: > There seems a bug in - it does not expand properties: > > > > #script > print ">> name='"+str(attributes.get('name'))+"'" > > > > > prints > > >> name='${test}' > > Do I need to do it manually? > No, it's a bug - I'

RE: scriptdef

2003-06-17 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
There seems a bug in - it does not expand properties: #script print ">> name='"+str(attributes.get('name'))+"'" prints >> name='${test}' Do I need to do it manually? - Alexey. -- { http://trelony.cjb.net/ } Alexey N. Solofnenko Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually) ---

Re: scriptdef

2003-06-09 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:14 am, Alexey Solofnenko wrote: > This is just great. It also solves

Re: scriptdef

2003-06-09 Thread peter reilly
Sounds cool. Peter. On Monday 09 June 2003 14:58, Conor MacNeill wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just added a task to allow tasks to be created using > scripts. It's loosely based on something I wrote a while back for Mutant. > > Attached below is an example usage. I had to make a few small mods to the

RE: scriptdef

2003-06-09 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
This is just great. It also solves