On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seems to me however the current LoaderUtil more has somewhat of a
> jdk-version match-up function?
It used to be used for that, yes. But this part of its functionality
is no longer needed in Ant 1.6 as we've dropped JDK 1.1 compatibi
Provided patch under bugzilla 18906
- ended up being ClasspathUtil.java
- added the newInstance idea as well
I need to get on with the show first now, but like to refactor
other parts of ant where similar cut/paste code might be
lingering (for sure o.a.t.a.taskdefs.Definer is candidate)
Hope to
We already have LoaderUtil in the util subpackage. Might fit there.
I started on PathUtil for the moment, all is static so could be
injected easily, seems to me however the current LoaderUtil more
has somewhat of a jdk-version match-up function?
- public ClassLoader getClassLoaderForPath(Path
-
From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 1:32 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: having datatypes load classes
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant
ednesday, April 09, 2003 1:32 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: having datatypes load classes
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
>>hoping
On Wed, 09 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thx for the invitation, if others want to be on the party: please
> join.
8-)
> woke up with something along the lines of a
> ClassLoaderFactory (name should be tuned down a bit, too much
> expectations here, inspiration welcome, Pat
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
hoping for some reuse here
One would think so, but the truth is that you'll find copy-paste reuse
in this area instead of delegation or somet
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was
> hoping for some reuse here
One would think so, but the truth is that you'll find copy-paste reuse
in this area instead of delegation or something.
Patches for
See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=104870800508326&w=2
And http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17199
I prefer the first link, since I'm the author of it, but the second link
addresses the same issue. If your elements do not need any
configurations though, it may be overk
