Ok, I'll make this change.
Martijn Kruithof wrote:
+/**
+ * The granularity of timestamps under the NT File System.
+ * NTFS has a granularity of 100 nanoseconds, which is less
+ * than 1 millisecond, so we set this to 0.
+ */
+public static final long NTFS_FILE_TIMES
+/**
+ * The granularity of timestamps under the NT File System.
+ * NTFS has a granularity of 100 nanoseconds, which is less
+ * than 1 millisecond, so we set this to 0.
+ */
+public static final long NTFS_FILE_TIMESTAMP_GRANULARITY = 0;
Shouldn't this be 1, testi
> Javadoc (okay DD? ;) )
Perfect! Thanks for agreeing to split code changes from Javadoc changes
into separate commits Matt ;-) It helps to better see the code changes
amongst the sometimes numerous Javadoc changes. --DD
-
To u
That reminds me, the forking rmic is broken.
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:48:21 +0200, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 0. I don't have access to a VAX myself
>
> I'd probably prefer an Alpha for the tests anyway 8-)
>
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0. I don't have access to a VAX myself
I'd probably prefer an Alpha for the tests anyway 8-)
> 2. See #1. As forking rmic uses java, it will get this for free.
But you changed code for forking javac and I think the code for
forkin
0. I don't have access to a VAX myself (unless I grab the source and
try cross compiling to x86 and hosting in a vmware window :)
1. I think because java has a special -v option, it doesn't need the
launcher script. But in that case, it doesn't make any difference and
could be left consistent with
On 6 Oct 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Index: DefaultCompilerAdapter.java
>
> +if (Os.isFamily("openvms")) {
> +//Use the VM launcher instead of shell launcher on VMS
> +//for java
> +exe.setVMLauncher(true);
>
Matt Benson wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * get the granularity of file timestamps.
+ * The choice is made on OS, which is
incorrect -it should really be
+ * by filesystem. We do not have an easy way
to probe for file systems,
+ * however.
Funny you should men
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +/**
> + * get the granularity of file timestamps.
> + * The choice is made on OS, which is
> incorrect -it should really be
> + * by filesystem. We do not have an easy way
> to probe for file systems,
> + * however.
Funny you should men
On 22 Jul 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there was still a little bone :)
Argh, thanks!
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test of the new version done, needed one correction.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:58 PM
Subject: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java
> antoine 2003/07/22 07:58:48
>
> Modified:
11 matches
Mail list logo
