On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why go for 'ant.library.dir' instead of 'ant.library.dirs'?
OK, I've had a second look.
It seems as if we could do that with some simple changes in Launcher,
namely adding ~/.ant/lib and ${ant.library.dirs} to the libPaths list
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is only peripherally related... this has been
> discussed briefly before, but I never received a
> satisfactory answer. Can someone justify the
> restriction that all Java classes and resources to be
> used by Ant must be in jars?
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dominique Devienne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why go for 'ant.library.dir' instead of
> 'ant.library.dirs'?
>
This is only peripherally related... this has been
discussed briefly before, but I never received a
satisfacto
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why go for 'ant.library.dir' instead of 'ant.library.dirs'?
Dunno, this was Randy's initial submission and I didn't think we'd
want to support more than one ANT_HOME/lib like directory. But then
again, why not.
Stefan
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Merge handling of ant.library.dir system property from HEAD
> +URL[] systemJars = Locator.getLocationURLs(antLibDir);
Why go for 'ant.library.dir' instead of 'ant.library.dirs'?
Given that your get URL[], it obviously accepts severa
