Hi,
I'm mailing only to say that Cristophe isn't alone. I have the same need
here, obtain the target "if" and unless conditions, but I do not have a way
to do this. I think that adding getters to Target is a great solution. How
can we suggest this modification to the API, to get it in the next rel
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Christophe Labouisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm wondering if using the Ant API as I do to peek into a project
> is something which is ok albeit the API is currently lacking a few
> things or the API should not be used the way I do?
Your approach is fine, I'd say.
I'm
Jose Alberto Fernandez said:
> Notice that you really cannot rely on the tasks allowing you to peek
> at the information inside them. Remember that in principle ANT is a
> component
> framework and that more and more we spect ANT components to be provided
> by third parties. So you cannot count on
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think these getters arent there because we havent needed it
> :-) Only the target class itself uses these information so
> why putting them in? But if there is a need for having
> getters outside I don´t see an obstacle while adding the
I think these getters arent there because we havent needed it :-)
Only the target class itself uses these information so why putting them in?
But if there is a need for having getters outside I don´t see an obstacle
while
adding them ... the information are not unofficial ...
Do you need more?
J
